sâmbătă, 29 februarie 2020

Puccini, by Fabio Campus, Nicola Lusuardi and Francesco Scardamaglia - Eight out of 10


Puccini, by Fabio Campus, Nicola Lusuardi and Francesco Scardamaglia
Eight out of 10


This is a note on the Film about the life of Puccini, not the book…
The merit of this biographical motion picture is that it brings to the fore the figure of what would arguably be called a genius – this viewer is not completely edified for two reasons, first the fact that a much greater mind has said that we should be careful with the genius label and second and more important, the undersigned is not equipped to evaluate the quality of an opera, a genre for which he has only the inclination to hear famous arias and segments and neither the patience, not the musical ear to go through the long singing dialogues of sopranos, baritones and others.

Otherwise, this film seems to be lost in complete obscurity, it happened to air on a channel in our parts where the audience is measured in less than one percent and at a time when a fraction of that abysmal rating is attained…we could have gathered together in a room, presumably, the few of us watching this feature which has no echoes elsewhere, forget about our land and to add to that, the treatment of the opera composer’s life, personality and achievements are not really resplendent…indeed, if they were, this would have been nominated, awarded prizes and acclaim…
As it is, the interest in watching this is purely personal and you surely could miss this note, unless you already did, for apart from the almost complete irrelevance of the movie – after all, the few who want to know about Puccini would go to the respectable sources, archives, libraries and other material and not look for light, deep learning and relevant details from such an obscure source.

The reason why I watched is because…I have a splendid macaw named Puccini and to admit to the already plain ignorance and disinterest in divine music, with the exceptions mentioned, it was just that the name sounded so amusing and appropriate – for all the wrong reasons – that I assigned it to my favorite baby, who was also supposed to engage in glorious, sublime arias – on the contrary, he speaks some interesting words, like oui, papa, hello and most laudatory Hannah, my daughter – and we had already had another macaw called Balzac so there you have it, Puccini could not have a less resounding name…
Part of the problem, perhaps the main one, is that the actor in the leading role does not have the granted immense charm, exceptional appeal needed to carry a feature that is concerned with the composer who has an overwhelming importance for the narrative, for which someone like Toni Servillo aka Gambardella in the astonishing La Grande Bellezza would have been so much more suited http://realini.blogspot.com/2017/08/note-on-la-grande-bellezza-aka-great.html
Well, there it is…as the Emperor kept saying in the spectacular, phenomenal Amadeus of milos Forman



vineri, 28 februarie 2020

The Man Who Surprised Everyone, written and directed by Aleksey Chupov and Natasha Merkulova - 8.7 out of 10


The Man Who Surprised Everyone, written and directed by Aleksey Chupov and Natasha Merkulova
8.7 out of 10


On some levels, this is a very original, interesting, somewhat provocative, perhaps psychological motion picture, though on another perspective, it is not as resplendent as other Russian movies, such as Moscow Does not Believe in Tears - http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/02/moscow-does-not-believe-in-tears.html - An Unfinished Piece for Mechanical Piano - http://realini.blogspot.com/2020/02/an-unfinished-piece-for-mechanical.html - or A Gentle Creature http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/09/a-gentle-creature-creature-written-and.html  
Never mind Leviathan, which should have been the first film, before Parasite, to win the Absolute Best Picture at the Academy Awards

Evgenly Tsyganov is fabulous in the leading role of the Man Who Surprised Everyone or Yegor, a state forest guard in Siberia, where he leads a quite normal life…well, it would have been in fact a quite peculiar, outré situation, given the taiga, remoteness, the muddy roads, the medieval inhabitants, all the shortcomings of Putin’s Russia exacerbated by the zone, but in the world where the Wuhan or new Coronavirus is speeding up to pandemic status , in spite of what the cretin Fat Donnie keeps saying, to live in an isolated part of the word looks fantastic, for one has the benefit that few people travel never, never mind the ones that carry the new cataclysmic disease…
Alas, the hero is still struck by an ailment and a deadly one at that, for he is diagnosed with cancer, at such a severe stage that he has only two months to live and the local doctor suggest that he considers moving to an hospice, where there would be assistance, free meals, they do not have to pay for it and perhaps it would be so much better for the family, which the Man who surprised everyone tries to protect, by keeping the diagnosis secret, though he would have to share it with the wife, equally impressive Natalya Kudryashova as Natalia, who would be aghast at another terrible incident, when the forest guard meets with poachers in the forest and in the clash that ensues, he kills one, then he is nearly murdered by another that he would eventually manage to overpower, though after tremendous effort…

The dying man tries to arrange a financial windfall for his would be widow, who is expecting a second child when she learns that the man has only a very short time left next to her, a catastrophe that she wants to avoid in spite of all odds, pushing him to see another, better specialist than the local doctor, though the hero is dead against this, given that it would cost money and he thinks it is useless, a theory endorsed by the expert, who would not take the banknotes pushed repeatedly towards his pocket by the desperate Natalia, retorting that there is nothing he can do, the disease is much too advanced and thus it is too late for anyone to stop it…

This is not enough to deter, or anyway stop the courageous, determined woman, who has another hope, since she had heard that a blind man could see after he had been to one of shamanic witch or maybe a charlatan (?), after she had already proved how resilient, gritty she is, when she had gone in the village to collect money – they had had no means to see these people – and she even talked to the mayor, against the will of her sick spouse, who would not have her beg from anyone…the official would access some emergency fund, but would also come to the house to give the sum in front of the hero and make some gestures to politicize, maybe weaponize this desperate help…
The woman with alleged supernatural powers makes some concoction, moves it around the body of Yegor, chanting some mysterious mantras, telling the sick man to let go – at which this viewer thought maybe this would be the key, the famous placebo, combined with a whole different mindset would work ‘miracles’…which maybe they would, though in a whole different manner – but without much success to speak of, given that the state of the main character does not improve…

There is a turning point, perhaps the zenith of the story, which we could take as too simplistic, or some would look at the magic, while the undersigned might agree with the aforementioned combination of placebo, combined to a switch to a positive, hopeful approach – people who are happier, more positive live longer, have more successful private and professional lives and more to the point of this narrative, they get sick less often and when they do, they are ill for Shorter periods…
Whichever angle or perspective is correct, a story told by the resigned (she admits her procedure failed) witch makes a radical change, after she tells the story of the goose (I think it was) which finds somehow that she is about to die and then choses some ‘disguise’ and hides among the ducks at the pond, thus making Death unable to find and take her along…upon hearing this tale, the once ‘manly, strong, solid’ man of the forest seems to get into the Monty Python Lumberjack song mood…’I’m a lumberjack and I’m ok…then moving to ‘wear high heels and wear a dress…’

Indeed, the man starts wearing a dress, later on earrings, make up, rouge for lip stick, in his effort to cheat Death, which might be unable to recognize him as the new person he is…if that works, it would not be revealed here, but until Death is or is not confused as to his identity, first the wife, then the locals are first surprised, but very quickly appalled, infuriated by this change, which brings upon his son the scorn, then the blows of the other children at school, then the men and women come to the house of the couple – he lives in the barn now, exiled there by the outraged spouse, who even says ‘why don’t you die like a normal being’ … a line that is used by the villagers as well – trespass and come to the barn to make this ‘creature’ come out, for these are far from ‘woke’, they descend straight from the middle ages and they would beat someone who dares do such a horrendous thing as dress like a woman…the fury would become a physical attack and the man would have to suffer a lot, before, who knows, maybe he finds some silver lining, some resurrection or hope…

miercuri, 26 februarie 2020

Funny Face by Leonard Gershe - Nine out of 10


Funny Face by Leonard Gershe
Nine out of 10


There are some ways one can look at this film and for maximum pleasure and bliss, perhaps the best would be to concentrate on the majestic, seraphic, sublime and divine Audrey Hepburn, one of the Goddesses of Cinema, who has the ability to carry this motion picture and any other for that matter – see Charade http://realini.blogspot.com/2017/03/note-on-charade-with-audrey-hepburn-and.html - Breakfast at Tiffany’s - http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/12/breakfast-at-tiffanys-based-on-novel-by.html - or Pygmalion - http://realini.blogspot.com/2014/06/pygmalion-by-george-bernard-shaw.html to be perfectly edified...

On the other hand, there is the issue of Fred Astaire – seen in On the Beach http://realini.blogspot.com/2017/06/on-beach-based-on-novel-by-nevil-shute.html - who might be a glorious dancer – indeed, he is – but seems inadequate as the ‘leading man’, at least to this inept viewer, who still thinks that the actor in the leading role, in a romantic movie, would better have the looks of Brad Pitt or Leonardo DiCaprio, though Astaire was a gentle, average looking, kind, but unattractive (?) man, who seems inappropriate to the Aphrodite of the big screen, although this is surely a wrong assessment and a biased, stupid note…
The motion picture is included on The New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list - https://www.listchallenges.com/new-york-times-best-1000-movies-ever-made/list/8 , but if you ask me, it is due to the presence, the aura, the persona of Audrey Hepburn…

marți, 25 februarie 2020

Terms of Endearment, written by James L. Brooks and Larry McMurtry, based on the book by the latter and directed by the former - 10 out of 10


Terms of Endearment, written by James L. Brooks and Larry McMurtry, based on the book by the latter and directed by the former
10 out of 10


This is a note on the film, based on the book

The under signed has been so thrilled and elated by the divine Lonesome Dove, the Pulitzer Prize Winner written by the author of the book on which this winner of Five Oscars, for Best Picture, Best Actress in a Leading Role, Best Director, Best Screenplay and Best Actor in a Supporting Role, included on The New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list - https://www.listchallenges.com/new-york-times-best-1000-movies-ever-made/list/22 - that he has read it twice and loved it - http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/08/lonesome-dove-by-larry-mcmurtry-10-out.html ...

Another splendorous movie, Hud, with legendary Paul Newman in the leading role, has also been based on the work by the same fantastic Larry McMurtry - http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/01/hud-based-on-novel-by-larry-mcmurtry.html - and to come back to Terms of Endearment, though it may seem to some as the classic Crying Game, the melodrama that touches audiences, it does have depth and the fact that one of the main personages dies might be seen as adding to the truthfulness, veracity of the screenplay, which is used with brilliance by Shirley MacLaine, who won the Oscar for her leading role, as Aurora Greenway, who is in her middle age, advancing towards old age, though that is relative for the seventies seem to be the new fifties or maybe forties, depending on how far we go back in history…there was a time when most died before they reached forty.
She is courted by some men, including the mesmerizing, mirthful Vernon Dahlart aka Danny DeVito, when her daughter, Emma Horton aka Debra winger, also nominated for the top Oscar, marries the apparently helpless, naïve Flap Horton aka Jeff Daniels, and they have to move away from the mother hen, all the way from Texas to Iowa, where he would work as a professor, with a rather small income, especially when they would have three children, but some significant success among his students, part of it not scholarly, but romantic, given occasion to an extramarital affair.

Aurora, though a grandmother, an idea she hates so much as to perhaps contribute to the suggestion that the daughter has an abortion – the fact that she is married to what the mother in law sees as a helpless case does not change the scope of the older woman – is interested in her neighbor, the former astronaut Garrett Breedlove aka spectacular Jack Nicholson, another Oscar winner in this film, who has to cope with the age, at the stage we meet him, he is dating a couple of much younger women, when drunk, he falls on the pavement and hurts his head, causing one of the girls to emphasize his age and the lack of control he appears to have…

Garrett is interested in Aurora, but more in a passing way, because he looks like he wants to philander and not settle, he is more into the hedonistic side of things and less concerned with the Eudaimonia, the longer term, deeper, resilient Joy and bliss, that is until his relationship with the mature, smart, provocative neighbor reaches a higher, more rewarding stage, which is not attained before some rather amusing, ridiculous battles, when the two go out for a meal, she is all out of her hair in the convertible that would mess all her appearance and then they get drunk, he falls into the sea, as they drive on the shore, with him almost standing and controlling to a degree the car, but nevertheless, the woman maneuvers abruptly and he is thrown into the waves…
Emma Horton is in the middle of a depression, with so little cash that she is facing a shameful adversity at the cashier, when she finds she does not have enough money for the groceries and the woman who is there makes it a whole lot worse, until the gentle, if too virginal Sam burns aka John Lithgow – the cast of the movie is nec plus ultra, glorious – intervenes and pays for the difference, then meets with the married woman – he is also married, though his wife had stopped having sex with him for years, because of some back pain and a refusal to contemplate sitting on top of him or any other coital position – and they get close and eventually they have an affair…

When Flap Horton is offered another position, in yet another state, they move again, though it is awful to see the woman he had had an affair with – and looks like he still has – also present at the new work place and sensible enough, Emma is infuriated with the father of three children who is not only pushing his spouse against the metaphorical wall, in the sense that she is using all her energy to deal with the children, the elder one of whom is rather difficult and apparently hateful of his mother, but he is also making a grave situation impossible with his going out of marriage with another female…
Hence, Emma is back with Aurora at her mansion, together with all the kids and she would eventually have to face a tragic situation, though we would not delve into that, but just limit to state that the connection between the grandmother and the astronaut is looking much better, after ups and downs, the wild swimmer and womanizer might think of steeling down with the neighbor that looked like antagonizing him and bringing the worst aspects …

This film is many ways a tour de force, explaining the selection of the Academy Award which picked it up for the Best Motion Picture, though among the other Nominees, The Big chill, The Dresser, probably The Right Stuff and surely Fanny and Alexander – notwithstanding the fact that before Parasite, for which Trump could not read the subtitles as some have it, while Seth Meyers rightly and comically pointed out that the Fat Donnie cannot even say the United States, there has been no Foreign Film winner of Best Picture…

duminică, 23 februarie 2020

Merci pour le Chocolat, written by Caroline Eliacheff and Claude Chabrol, based on the novel by Charlotte Armstrong - 9.6 out of 10


Merci pour le Chocolat, written by Caroline Eliacheff and Claude Chabrol, based on the novel by Charlotte Armstrong
9.6 out of 10


Merci pour le Chocolat is the kind of crime story where we do not have a murder and then we follow in the footsteps of Hercule Poirot, Sherlock Holmes or another famous detective to observe who has done it, but on the contrary, we gradually, starting from early on, suspect that Marie-Claire ‘Mika’ Muller aka majestic, divine Isabelle Huppert is acting strangely and she surely would soon take a hatchet or a bazooka and summarily end the life of multitudes and if not, well, at least a dozen would have to be dispatched…

Early on, she is married to serene, eerie, levitating – but we soon see that because he is on drugs – Andre Polonski aka talented, outré, outlandish – not as in the stupid Trump’s impeachment trial – Jacques Dutronc – wondrous in Van Gogh – and we learn soon that the man is a successful, acclaimed pianist and she is the boss of a major company, a chocolate factory, where she would operate in the manner of the infamous Fat Donnie, when she is faced with opposition, well…she eliminates it without remorse and the shadow of a doubt or hesitation
Anna Mouglalis is able to more than stand up to the major players in this spectacular drama as Jeanne Pollet, an upcoming pianist who has lunch with her mother, boyfriend and another friend, when she finds about a barmy, bizarre incident that took place right after she was born, when Andre Polonski had come to see his new born baby, he was given…Jeanne, as it turned out by mistake, for he had had a boy and there was some shortage of bracelets and then the confusion was cleared…

Nevertheless, the fact that she is a pianist, just as Polonski is could indicate something more or other than just a gaffe, for we all know about genes – indeed, some recent studies have revealed that even the tendency to…watch television to a certain degree can be inherited…not 100% evidently, but it is still baffling and tormenting- and the young woman is made to wonder if her real father is not the famous artist after all and therefore she decides to pay a visit, when she is kept at the door by the son of the celebrity, Guillaume Polonski, she passes by him and explains that she is the infant he – the pianist – had kept in his arms years before…
Intrigued by the story, the musician invites the girl to spend more time, fascinated by the idea that she is also a musician – a detail that has all the minds of those present circulating the hypothesis of the babies swap – and then they agree on some lessons from the established artist for the girl who has a way to go…

Alas, this situation does not seem to please Marie – Claire Muller, though on the surface, she declares her ravishment at the encounter and the colossal pleasure she would have to see the girl again, she invites her to a room where she intentionally spills the recipient with her ‘famous, regular chocolate’, the beverage she prepares for the others as a ritual, every evening, but which the guest has seen her in a  reflection spill on the floor on purpose…a detail which would so much puzzle her as to expose it to Guillaume, who is very antagonistic and hostile, but when she finds from the lab analysis, made by her boyfriend, that the drink contains drugs, basically, she understands she is on to some very dark secret…
Meanwhile, Mika visits Louis Pollet, the mother of the young woman, who is the director of the Legal Medicine Hospital or some such institution, and tries to muddy the waters, spy on the family or she acts upon some dark, inexplicable, vicious instinct, for she had seen very well that the daughter had not told the mother about the visit and the special character would later explain some of the workings of her devious mind – also the fact that this could well be a medical condition…not that this would absolve her of guilt, but may still act as attenuating circumstances to a certain degree…

Jeanne makes progress in her lessons and the older pianist is more than satisfied with her talent, though this closeness might not work to the advantage of the girl, given the presumed jealousy of the scheming Marie-Claire, the one who drugs her step son and husband – we find that she was the sister of the late wife of the artist, Guillaume’s mother, who had died in a suspicious accident, bizarre in that her surviving husband is not sure if she had not killed herself, given the drugs found at her autopsy…this mystery would be cleared, but by this time, every viewer is entitled to more than guess, be sure what the real events had looked like…
The younger artist is invited to spend two days with the Polonski family and this provokes a moment of ‘truth’ with her mother, who is facing the idea that her daughter seems to think she is the daughter of the other pianist – she has explained earlier to Mika about the legal situation, how tests have to be ordered by a legal trial to be started and the fact that both her husband and she have always been convinced that Jeanne is her daughter and the debacle at the nursery was just that…a mistake.
The climax reached in this marvelous story is gradual, poignant, smart and we expect it with breathless impatience and we may also wonder why the girl is not more cautious, given the circumstances, but on the other hand, people act in strange ways and without anything definite, she has no real evidence to say that Mika is a serious villain and not a confused, though decent figure, with a penchant for out of the ordinary acts…

Bound for Glory, based on the autobiography of Woody Guthrie - Seven out of 10


Bound for Glory, based on the autobiography of Woody Guthrie
Seven out of 10


This short note is about the film, not the book


Surely, viewers would enjoy this film, if they have the stamina, concentration, good, maybe common sense to stay with it, unlike the under signed, who has not found the patience, means to overcome superficiality, lack of grit, inability to see value even when right there, on the screen, in front of him, considering Bound for Glory is included on The New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list:


on some level, two hours and twenty seven minutes would be a detail that attracts someone to see a film with so many moments of entertainment, music and more, but on another level, it convinced this ‘viewer’ to…well, stop viewing it quite soon…

sâmbătă, 22 februarie 2020

Dinner at Eight, screenplay by Frances Marion, Edna Ferber, Herman Mankiewicz, based on the play by George Kaufman - 10 out of 10


Dinner at Eight, screenplay by Frances Marion, Edna Ferber, Herman Mankiewicz, based on the play by George Kaufman
10 out of 10


Dinner at Eight is a wonderful motion picture, included on The New York Times Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list - https://www.listchallenges.com/new-york-times-best-1000-movies-ever-made/list/6 - benefiting from a fabulous cast, with splendid John Barrymore in the role of a failing, former star, Larry Renault, equally brilliant Lionel Barrymore as the old, sick Oliver Jordan, resplendent Jean Harlow as Kitty Packard and a few other phenomenal artists…

Marie Dressler is hilarious and imposing, noble and so dazzling as Carlotta Vance, an appreciated, legendary artist who is overwhelmed when people she meets express their awe, but then they continue in a clumsy way by saying…when they were kids, they were fascinated to see her…and by this making clear that Carlotta Vance is so advanced in age- nevertheless, she is so smart, imaginative, amusing and self-deprecating as to joke herself: ‘do not tell me that your great great grandfather loved my acting’ or something of the kind.
Oliver Jordan used to be a successful businessman, whose stock in his shipping business was very valuable, but now it is so devalued, his health is so poor that he seems unable to stop even his friend, Carlotta, from selling her shares and besides, the one he hoped to support him, the rather crooked, Trump-like con man Dan Packard, is in fact double crossing him and trying to get hold of shares to speculate and send the poor man down…again, in the manner of the most over rated business man ever, the crook from the White House…

Oliver Jordan is trying to have the Dinner at Eight to help him overcome the serious financial problems, perhaps the bankruptcy he may be facing if the worst scenario comes to pass – and if the ruthless Dan Packard has his way and he is not stopped by…his wife, Kitty Packard aka once the superstar Jean Harlow – and thus he asks his wife, Millicent Jordan, to take care of the details, send the invitations, even to Packard, the one who does not want to come, until he finds he would have the chance to meet someone he had been wanting to get close to for so many years and therefore he is keen on attending.
Kitty Packard has an affair with her doctor – better said she used to have one, for the man is not interested anymore, though as to the future outcome we might be somewhat unsure – and the maid knows about it, when challenged by the brutal, impolite, chauvinist, rude, what can we say but yet another face of the same Fat Donny Trump, husband she covers for the missus, but afterwards she is quick to ask for one of the many valuable bracelets, as some form of bribe, to avoid blackmail…besides, the rich woman has so many…

Another secret is hidden by the daughter of Dan and Millicent Jordan, Paula, who is involved with the much older, former famous actor, Larry Renault, who has a massive drinking problem and what is worse, he is now forgotten and rejected by studios and producers and when given a part, it is so insignificant as to have only one line or maybe a couple and facing this trauma, descent into absolute obscurity could be too much to take for the alcoholic who has no money for drinks, for the room in the hotel from which the manager comes to evict him, though politely, under the pretext that some loyal customers are coming and want this exact room and there are n others available…
The relationship with the much younger, though also married Paula Jordan might have done something to rejuvenate the failing actor, but his exaggerated drinking, the impecunious stage of his life, the prospect of having no credit with…well, anyone, for even the bellboy would not bring a bottle seeing as the hotel, other joints would not accept to sell him anything waiting forever to be paid, might prompt him to take a dramatic decision…

Meanwhile, Kitty confronts her husband, tells him about having an affair, though she does not say who it is and the cuckold husband is so dumb as to exclude the doctor from the list of suspects – when the maid says the wife had only one visitor she knows of and that is the doctor, Dan Packard is ridiculous in dismissing this line of questioning outright – and the woman take a rather impressive, feminist stand against the crook and she is even forcing him to reverse the strategy he had been pursuing, of crushing financially poor, sick Oliver Jordan, or else she would tell him and everyone else what loathsome dealings the man had been pursuing…
Oliver Jordan is already looking like he might have a heart attack and die any moment now, but when he finds from Carlotta Vance that she had sold her shares to some unknown individual – a cover for Packard – it looks like this is the end, figuratively and literally for the man that might still have a chance when Kitty kicks the legs of the vicious husband, is then ready to expose him and his gruesome actions and then maybe he would be pushed to walk back what he had done, before it is too late

Meanwhile, Millicent Jordan is facing another disaster, although this one is amusing and of a different nature and much smaller in scale, dealing with the missing butler, the fact that the most important guests cancel and fly to Florida to treat some ailment, the main dish is ruined, and there are many other obstacles and impossible circumstances to cope with…such as the number of guests, which must be even but seems to be impossible to arrange in that manner and other such adversities…

joi, 20 februarie 2020

Force of Evil, written by Abraham Polonsky and Ira Wolfert, based on the novel by the latter and directed by the former - 10 out of 10


Force of Evil, written by Abraham Polonsky and Ira Wolfert, based on the novel by the latter and directed by the former
10 out of 10


This splendorous motion picture is included on The New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list - https://www.listchallenges.com/new-york-times-best-1000-movies-ever-made/list/8 - and it is indeed one of the best one can see and although it dates from 1948, it seems to have echoes, a disturbing message and similarities in the present where America looks like regressing, for, if in the movie the Force of Evil could be contained and is anyway limited to some villains of power, but a relatively small one, in the present, Evil sits down in the White House…

Only yesterday, the Orange Evil has pardoned a line of major crooks, people involved in and sentenced for prison terms for corruption and associated felonies, players like the former governor of Illinois, who upon the senate seat becoming available with Barak Obama being sworn in as president – what glorious days those were and what calamity we all have at this time – he initiated the selling of the public office, and this after claiming in his (phony and irrelevant in the Senate) impeachment trial that his only concern regarding the Ukraine was…fighting corruption, as in the Godfather asking for some enemy to find peace…eternal peace after being whacked, or having an ‘offer he could not refuse’.
John Garfield is mesmerizing as lawyer Joe Morse the antihero of the feature, a lawyer who states early on, in the first few scenes actually, that he wants to make a million dollars – maybe upwards of one hundred million in the currency of this day – and he would stop at nothing for that, forcing banks against the wall after the numbers racket would be fixed to have the number on which everybody bets on the 4th of July, independence day in America, and causing small operations to close…

One such small betting shop is run by the brother of the villain lawyer, Leo Morse aka formidable Thomas Gomez, who has an outfit that breaks the law, be it on a small scale and when the sibling comes over with a very daring, apparently obscene scheme through which those who will have placed bets would lose together with so many others in the process, the ‘honest man’ rejects the proposition in the most vehement terms and wants his brother to get out of his office and mentions that in the past, the older brother seems to have made sacrifices for the benefit of the lawyer and as gratitude he is now pushed into some abhorrent game he does  not want to be a part of…

However, the manager of the illegal but small time operation has a protégée, Doris Lowry aka wondrous Beatrice Pearson, that he wants to continue to have a security a job, though the young woman is so distressed, disappointed when she hears what the lawyer puts on the table that once he had left, she comes to say she resigns, she is very thankful for the support the manager had offered and knows how much this had meant to her, but it is evident that she is the Honest character – if there is another one in this story, it is hard to find him or her in perfect form, for Leo is just enough, but only for a ‘normal person’, he does work outside the law mind you…
Joe Morse is supposed to be a partner of a gangster of the Trump size, with more brains though, in the sense that he is ruthless, has no loyalty – though he demands it of the others – he is interested only in his profit and whatever comes against his projects has to go (‘as in take her out’…the honest, brave, role model Ambassador in the Ukraine that fought corruption and would not facilitate the vicious, corrupt, loathsome games played by Trump and cronies) Ben Tucker, married to Edna Tucker aka great Marie Windsor.

The latter comes to warn Joe that he has his phone tapped – yes, even in the forties it happened – and she is interested in him, or conquering, dominating this courageous male, perhaps she just likes to play games outside the marriage with the disreputable husband, but the fact is that the lawyer rejects her advances in a manner that would have feminists scream in anger today…furthermore, the rather macho, superior and sexist way he deals even with the woman he seems to fall for, Doris, is more than inadequate, old school, conservative or quite fundamentalist and medieval, since he is quite aggressive, more than impolite when he throws his hat at her, manhandles her and places her on some furniture in the hall of the small betting place of the father.
Doris Lowry is the Ultimate Saint in that she not only takes all this male chauvinism in her stride, objecting here and there, but ultimately showing a motherly concern for the man that plays so much outside the law, endangers so many, starting with his brother and is flagrantly pushing his corrupt scheme with the attitude of a Trump, claiming ‘it was a perfect call’ when everyone – who has an IQ above 40 and some EQ to speak of  - could see it was extortion, bribery and as monstrous as possible…

The gangsters involved in the big game have all the Force of Evil – again, just like the most powerful man on the planet, who is alas also one of the dumbest, immoral, egoistic, narcissistic, schizophrenic, idiotic and most pathological liars we can mind – and people get killed, without mentioning any names let us just say that this is not the Hollywood feel good fare – though not as violent as the majestic Parasite, winner for the first time as a foreign language film of the Best Motion Picture Academy Award for this year -

luni, 17 februarie 2020

The Adjuster, written and directed by Atom Egoyan - Seven out of 10


The Adjuster, written and directed by Atom Egoyan
Seven out of 10


The Adjuster has been included on The New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies ever Made list:

Furthermore, even this viewer has been enthused by Where the Truth Lies, written and directed by the same acclaimed writer director:

however, The Adjuster does not seem to accessible to just about anyone and I had to admit to my limitations when the first ten minutes made it clear that this is not a movie that would agree with me, in that the subtleties, the original look at the Adjuster of insurance cases, the arrow throwing character is too much to take in, digest and understand symbols, hidden meanings, what made The New York times and others rate this as one of the best films ever made…
Thus, the conclusion is that this motion picture is surely wonderful, but this is where the Groucho Marx applies for the undersigned…

Upon leaving a party, Groucho Marx is supposed to have said:

-          “Thank you! I had a wonderful time…only not this time”

duminică, 16 februarie 2020

L’ospite aka The Guest, written by Duccio Chiarini, Davide Lantieri, Marco Pettenello, directed by the former - Eight out of 10


L’ospite aka The Guest, written by Duccio Chiarini, Davide Lantieri, Marco Pettenello, directed by the former
Eight out of 10


If not explosive, the introducing scene of this interesting Italian motion picture is quite sensational in that we have Chiara aka talented Silvia D’Amico naked and Guido aka the main character, L’ospite, aka remarkable Daniele Parisi, also undressed, with his head between the legs of his lover, in what is not so startling anymore, in a world of cinema that has abandoned the walls, the boundaries that Once Upon a Time in…Hollywood would have the censors ban suggestions of sexual acts, never mind nudity, which is not to be regretted, unless we think of what some thinkers maintain was an age that invited film makers to be subtle, creative and instead of showing couples copulating on screen, they would go to extremes to have romance hide secrets, intriguing bonds and allusions that made the savor, spice of so many “Screwball comedies”…

Chiara and Guido have come to an important point in their relationship, which could become a nadir, may be the challenge they need to become ever more attached to each other, once they will have overcome this adversity, or it could mark The End of the Affair, if they do not find solutions to their diverging views on…the couch, which she dislikes and he enjoys, the pairs of underwear that are received from his mother and to the woman indicate a lack of maturity, a too strong dependence on the parent probably and most importantly, the fact that while she thinks they need to ‘grow’, to change the status quo, and try to make more money, he is quite content with their situation, although he admits that her complaints are correct in that they cannot afford to travel and they are quite limited in their means…
The Hedonic Treadmill concept  refers to the fact that we get used to material goods, the state of affairs in what has to do with the car – no matter how expensive it is – the watch, the clothes – of which we anyway wear in a proportion of 20% of them for 80% of the time in a famous ratio – and we are much better in spending the income on experiences and in the case of the couple in the movie, he may be right in that Love is the ultimate ingredient of happiness and sense of meaning, fulfilment and achievement, while she also has a point, given that in dire circumstances – it is debatable if this applies to their smaller apartment, the presumably inadequate car that he has to repair – being happy is harder…living on the streets does not bring about Nirvana, unless one is an august, seraphic and balmy Buddhist or Zen master…

L’ospite and his girlfriend may test the 7 Principles of Making Marriage Work, by the most respected, best expert on relationships in the world, John Gottman, the guru that is famous for the accuracy of his predictions and analysis, he has over 90% success in foretelling which couples would stay together and which would separate, after watching them interact for only some minutes…

The Four Horsemen of the apocalypse, as presented in the 7 Principles are Stonewalling, Criticism, Defensiveness and Contempt and it is hard to say if Chiara and Guido descend into all of them, but the fact is that when she mentions her intentions of applying for a job in Canada, he is not thrilled and Criticism and Stonewalling follow, after which she says she wants to be alone for some time, to think about the future, see how she feels, understand better what it is that they have in store for them.
By the way, the opening scene was not about oral sex, the man is not there, between the legs of his partner to pleasure her, but to find the condom that got lost and was broken in the act of coitus, which prompts one of the discussions about the pill, the prospect of having a baby, which is crazy for her, given that they have a status that does not look well, materially, and he is rather unhappy because he sees the traditional family unit, with children and married man and wife as the Secret of Bliss…

Guido has it right in that studies have shown that the Happiest men and Women do not have in common great – literal – wealth, but wonderful connections with family and friends…nevertheless, the point of The Guest is that some prejudice on the matter of the ‘perfect unit’ is not in order, for once they argue, the man moves and becomes L’ospite, the travelling friend who sleeps with others and is quite amazed to see how much they dispute and quarrel and even the pregnant colleague is in fact looking for wellbeing, pleasure, satisfaction outside her home, for she has fallen in love with someone else…
The jealous protagonist follows his lover, who is a tour guide, but longs for a different position in Canada, where one of her mates is a director of a museum – a less relevant one objects Guido, but a director nonetheless, as the lover insists - where her superior studies and diplomas would be good for more than such a lowly position – I have been a guide for some decades too.

When Chiara takes a foreigner, possibly an American, on a private tour with her scooter, the infuriated, now abandoned man follows her in the car borrowed from the parents and when he catches up with them, he makes a scene and shouts ‘che cazzo’, translated with ‘what the fuck’, though it looks like it is more of ‘what the cock’… anyway, the girl tries to make him calm down, in a quite restrained manner, though the character was quite insulting and foolish…

Guido would gradually understand more and become sympathetic to the position of his ex- partner, even going as far as to at least claim that he would accept it if she confessed to an affair, and he would travel to Canada if need be, expressing the desire at the place where he had been working on an essay, but it might not work for them, alas…

sâmbătă, 15 februarie 2020

The Magician aka Ansiktet, written and directed by Ingmar Bergman - 10 out of 10

The Magician aka Ansiktet, written and directed by Ingmar Bergman
10 out of 10


Ingmar Bergman might be the only genius that has been able to make so many masterpieces, from Fanny and Alexander (which had been for quite a while the best film ever for this viewer, and it is still in the top 10) to The Seventh Seal, from Virgin Spring to Cries & Whispers – the list is long and some links to the notes on these films will be posted below…

The Magician is one of a brilliant series and the magnum opus has Albert Emanuel Vogler aka the actor – titan Max von Sydow, who travels with his wife, Manda Vogler aka fantastic Ingrid Thulin, and some other companions and members of the “Vogler’s Magnetic Health Theater’ and offers to entertain the public in the towns they pass through, but they are escorted and taken to the residence of the Consul Egerman aka another of the regular, fabulous actors that appear in the chefs d’oeuvre of spectacular Ingmar Bergman, Erland Josephson, where they face the local authorities.
Warned about their arrival, the Consul, Dr. Vergerus, minister of Health played by another legend, Gunnar Bjornstrand, and the Police Superintendent Starbeck question the theater company and their Porte parole is voluble, florid, Mephistopheles Tubal, who claims that though the powers of Ansiktet are impressive, Doctor Vogel is dumb and does not speak, therefore Tubal would answer any questions…

In short, the consul and the rest of the locals explain that the visitors would have to perform in front of them, Doctor Vergerus in particular would analyze the show to see what is wrong within, and for this purpose they would stay at the residence of the Consul, they will eat there, but when Tubal is pushing for the main rooms, he is told by Egerman that they will eat in the kitchen, prompting the speaker of the troupe to express the wish to move into town…this is not possible, for the artists are apparently in some kind of house arrest…
A Series of Unfortunate Events would follow, with Doctor Vergerus being influenced by Albert Vogel, though he claims he does not feel anything, only to visit his rooms later and come across…his wife, for the one who had initially claimed to be Mr. Aman, wearing men’s clothes and some makeup, is in fact Manda Vogler…

Meanwhile, Tubal would offer the ‘love potion’ which Aphrodite herself has prepared and employees of the house are keen to buy some, though he first says that the magic product is only accessible to princesses, it is so luxuriant, sacramental, splendorous and effective…

Charmed and attracted by Sofia Garp, the head cook, Tubal changes the offer and for something like thirteen krona for the bottle and twenty for two, he would offer the rare concoction, which he gets from the old granny Vogler, the woman that may have some supernatural powers, though she says at one point that there is only some rat poison left, which the Machiavelli Tubal sells for love solution anyway…
In front of the special audience, Ansiktet and his team perform some well-known tricks, like the levitation of a body from the ground, which is exposed by the Superintendent when he pulls the curtains apart and we see one assistant lifting the body with ‘invisible’ ropes, but this interference in the hidden side of the show would be paid by the foolish simpleton.

A man would be tied with invisible chains and this time, there is something they do, be that ‘magic’ or just a strong will and an overpowering of the mind of a weaker character, but one climax would be reached when the wife of the police representative, Henrietta Starbeck, comes in front of the Magician and when asked, she spills all the possible beans…that the children do not have the Superintendent as their father, except perhaps the stupid ones, and many awful, embarrassing, humiliating revelations that stun all present, especially the cuckold, diminished if not destroyed spouse…Mrs. Starbeck will have no idea about what she has just said under hypnosis…
Albert Vogler apparently dies, though he has before his departure a confrontation with Doctor Vergerus, when the latter is in the room where Manda Vogler and her husband would spend the night and he now sees that she is a woman dressed as a man, who is forced to explain this cover, saying they had been wanted…indeed, we would learn that in one instance, another rich potentate falls for her and when Vogler defends the honor of his spouse and kicks the aristocrat, they end up in jail for two months, at the end of which, the noble would free them and furthermore, he would recommend them to the Royal family of Sweden, where they may still perform in the near future…

The Magician is a sublime motion picture for the complex manner in which it addresses the main theme, though it is evidently a tour de force in every single department, acting, costumes…everything else, that of Magic, which is presented with the easy tricks that are used to confuse, distract the attention of the public, but there is also the component that is the opposite of charlatanism and the power of the mind of Ansiktet is evident and immense, many of the things that happen are the consequence of the mindset, the force of suggestion and…the indefinable, the…Magic.

Notes on other masterpieces by divine Ingmar Bergman are available here: http://realini.blogspot.com/2017/05/fanny-and-alexander-by-ingmar-bergman.html
And more at:
http://realini.blogspot.com/

joi, 13 februarie 2020

How to Marry a Millionaire, based on the plays by Zoe Akins, Dale Eunson and Katherine Albert - Nine out of 10


How to Marry a Millionaire, based on the plays by Zoe Akins, Dale Eunson and Katherine Albert
Nine out of 10


In the present, the title of the radiant motion picture might be very different, in fact it could sound opposite to the original – Why Marry a Millionaire – might be appropriate, given for one thing the Monster that sits on top of the ‘free’ world, who has just done another horrible thing – he has the habit of doing multiple thuggish things per day – when he interfered in the act of – once impartial – justice in favor of his goon, and having his douche bag change the Justice Department into a mafia annex – just like we used to see in ‘emerging countries’ like mine, where Alhamdulillah we fare so much better, for yes, we have our own idiotic goodfellas, but the godfather sits in jail now, now in the ruler’s chair…

Furthermore, being a Millionaire has been proven to be a chimera for those who think it brings happiness, for it does not and once again, the Vicious, Vengeful Orange cretin is the ultimate proof, with his continuous outrageous, hateful outbursts in spite of ‘the most charmed life’ he has had, as Seth Meyers wonderfully puts it, whereas he should be serene, joyful, blissful, magnanimous, ecstatic, buoyant, the Millionaire – there is no way for Trump to be a billionaire, for he would be the first to put the tax returns on every corner to show off and the fact that he keeps them a secret, just like his school scores, demonstrates that he does not have the wealth he claims…not by a long shot – is the paradigm of the unfortunate, destitute loser.

If only to see the resplendent Marilyn Monroe, Lauren Bacall and Betty Grable and this comedy would be worth watching and if we add the message, then we have a wonderful feature, which could also support the idea that searching for wealth as the Secret of Happiness is wrong, for although people should stay away from the streets – the case of the homeless Indian that is blissful is rare – because being dirt poor does not equal having Ultimate Joy – unless of course one is a perfect Buddhist or a Stoic, uninterested in the passing, material things and only concerned with the eternal, cosmic and galactic matters – but just being comfortable would be sufficient.
Indeed, multiple studies and extensive research have shown that there is even a figure of about $ 60- 70,000 income per year, which changes depending on where one resides, if it is San Francisco it has to be higher than 110 k, while in Alabama it could be well south of 60k, at which the individual could relax and worry less about the income and think in terms of rules of happiness, such as spend on ‘experience’ – for instance get on a cruise and if you are stranded near Yokohama, where inmates get the Corona virus at alarming rates, well, good luck – and not on material goods, which bring about the Hedonic Adaptation phenomenon, which means that we get used with the most expensive purchases, such as cars, jewels and clothes – of which we tend to wear in a proportion of 20% during 80% of the time ratio…

As to How to Marry, Schatze aka outstanding iconic Lauren Bacall, Pola Debevoise aka Goddess Marilyn Monroe and Loco Dempsey aka equally brilliant Betty Grable set themselves the task of getting a fortune and in a comical manner, they get entangles into outré situations, such as the one wherein Schatze keeps rejecting a man she thinks has no pocket money, whereas he may offer a surprise as in he could be the Trump of his age – which is a joke, for the president of America, unless we live in an apocalyptic nightmare, is actually the supreme con man, a gangster with little fortune – never mind that wherever he has got he has as a consequence of cheating with his fake University, the vicious charity, and a series of con jobs that is not worth mentioning here…
While embarked on this quest for fortune, the material kind, they may be more fortunate than they hoped for, in that though some of them might not get the cash they had desired, the reward of Love could be there, within reach and according to Barbara Fredrickson, the ultimate expert on positivity, Love is the ultimate component of Positivity as explained in the magnum opus of the same title – the other ingredients are awe, interest, amusement, inspiration, pride, hope, serenity, joy and gratitude…

How to Marry a Millionaire is included on the New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list - https://www.listchallenges.com/new-york-times-best-1000-movies-ever-made/list/11

How About Adolf, based on the play by Alexandre de la Patelliere and Mathieu Delaporte - Eight out of 10


How About Adolf, based on the play by Alexandre de la Patelliere and Mathieu Delaporte
Eight out of 10


The idea of the motion picture is challenging, intriguing, provocative, fresh, thought provoking and so is the first part, but it seems that the fortissimo,  andante con brio that we can hear and admire at the beginning becomes a pianissimo, a soft, perhaps somewhat trouve, cliché that we appear to have seen in other features.

Nevertheless, it is quite captivating to see the protagonists engage in a clash About Adolf, which is announced from the title, though the German name Vorname, based on the original, adapted as a French film, What’s in a Name aka Le Prenom, sounds much less abrupt, and when Thomas announces his sister and brother in law that he will name his son Adolf, the others are aghast, terrified by the implications.
In Germany, Nazi parties are forbidden as is fascist propaganda and other such vile activities, though the Afd does entertain extremist, nationalistic, xenophobic ideals – why, the American president boasts about these on a regular basis and to use the Bernie (not a favorite of mine, with his honeymooning in Moscow, during the Soviet Union days no less) joke, this is his good side…

Apparently, to name one’s offspring using the name of the late mass murderer is not forbidden though, even if officials at the respective office have to analyze the selection and Thomas, who is known for his dark jokes, pleads for this bizarre idea, after the hosts and the family friend Rene take part in game where they try to guess the name…Alexander the Great, Artemis, though she was a goddess, Aramis and others are named…even Abraham, paradoxically.
The argument is strong against choosing Hitler as inspiration, although we are just speaking of his Christian, presumably less known name, for the others are vehemently protesting that the child would be ostracized, isolated by peers, teachers and all alike, this stupid nonsense would have ghastly, calamitous consequences for the future of the yet unborn infant and the explanations pour continuously.

Nevertheless, Thomas has some good points to make too, for he turns to other infamous butchers, such as Joseph Stalin and this strikes a particularly sensitive chord with me, given that the West forgets about the viciousness of the communists, who have killed many more millions than Hitler did and they now look in awe at the likes of Bernie, when they should all get behind Butigieg, Klobuchar or Biden and avoid the socialist madness.

There are other names that should be stricken from the list and the question of What’s in a Name – as in the French version of this motion picture, the one that had inspired the German adaptation – is placed from the start, when we travel through streets and thousands are called Goethe, many others bear the name of German composers, though the wife of Schubert – if my memory does not play tricks – is worthy of getting admiration and square names, she is almost forgotten by authorities…
The second part of the game, where the pregnant wife seems rather abrasive, and then we learn about the unexpected affair of Rene, who had been wrongfully presumed to be gay, does not appear as challenging as the first, though the movie is interesting, does a lot to make the public think of preconceived ideas, and prejudices…

miercuri, 12 februarie 2020

The Day After I’m Gone, written and directed by Nimrod Eldar - 8.5 out of 10


The Day After I’m Gone, written and directed by Nimrod Eldar
8.5 out of 10


For those who have a teenage daughter – like this viewer – and others actually, this film would echo, provoke emotional empathy and perhaps create some significant worries – is the ‘child’ safe? – in one scene in the movie, the father of the missing girl says she is no longer a child, when asked by a police woman, but she then underlines that for the law, up to a certain age, she is still ‘a child’.

Menashe Noy is wonderful as Yoram, the father of a troubled daughter, a man whose silences are formidable - the actor can evidently play in some of those Japanese plays where they say nothing with words, but speak volumes with their face changes – a doctor at a wild life park, where they bring in a jaguar – at least it looked like one – which seemed so real and yet one would wonder if they used special effects, or they just filmed when such an animal happened to be brought in for some checkup or an issue…
Maybe they adapted the script to the animal…if the park had to examine some other species, we would have seen the panther brought in – maybe this was the panther – and some interaction is filmed among the animals, where some visitor walks out of the car, to get the ball for his son, attracting the criticism of the doctor and the wrath of one of the guardians, who explains that in case the rhinoceros were to come charging, the guard would have had to ‘annihilate it’…that was not the word he used, which was anyway translated from Hebrew, but it was a suspense moment for the under signed…

What does he mean? He would kill the poor beast for a stupid ass?

The daughter of the veterinarian, Roni, is missing and he has to call the police, where they emphasize that she is a ‘child’ and ask him some questions that bring forth amusing answers, that also show how old fashioned the man is, at least in things connected with iPhones – he has a cellular that appears to have been made sometime before 2002, or cost $ 2 – tweeter, social media, because he has no idea if the daughter has an Instagram account and almost nothing about what she does online…
Roni returns nevertheless, but just as we may think this problem is over, in the middle of the night, there are heavy knocks at the door and when the father opens, a uniformed man and a woman are at the door, together with some other emergency response people behind.

Although it may look clear that this is official and not a prank call, Yoram wants to see identification – this being Israel, it could actually make a lot of sense, given the many attacks, the permanent state of alert cause by various murderous lunatics that kill innocents, the rockets that come raining down from fundamentalists, Hezbollah and so many others.
Alas, the hero becomes more than unreasonable, quite pathetic in his opposition to the emergency unit at the door, even after they say that there is an outfit which has received an alert message, indicating that someone had expressed the intention to commit suicide at this address, identified with the IP numbers on the net…the father is insisting that she has returned, it is alright, he had made a notification about her missing, but all is fine now, she is asleep, in her room and there is no need for all this kerfuffle in the middle of the night.

It goes on like this for what appears to be a very long time, until the emergency responders get into the room of the girl, who has indeed taken something dangerous, but the fight is not over, because now the veterinarian shouts he is a doctor and explains what they need to do…she has taken ‘x’ and he gives the name of whatever he is sure she has ingurgitated and makes every effort to act in the direction he is sure it must be acted…
The others are successful finally in restraining him and they take the girl to the hospital, where another somewhat amusing, if also outré scene takes place, for while Yoram is waiting on a hall, others are in the same place, two of them ultra- orthodox, religious men, with the well-known hats, the curly long sideburns and the continuous bending back and forth, accompanied by the reading of holy texts and while they do this, another ‘man of god’ comes to the waiting, anxious veterinarian and offers him some texts, just like Mormons, Witnesses of Jehovah and other denominations often do and indicates where to read…what passage.

Yoram is a freethinker – or at least he looks it and his attitude looks like he does not give a penny for the idea of reading prayers to make his child recover – but this turns out to be a critical moment, that would reveal just how much he loves his daughter, because he would relate that he prayer for her while waiting for her hopeful recovery, though there would be many tensions between them.
Indeed, he would comment on the fact that there is an element of hate included in…love and he is not saying it, but positive psychology studies have shown that parents experience a boost in wellbeing when…their children leave home – there would be some, better said many explanations for that…teenagers can be difficult to handle, as Roni proves so eloquently, and the continuous fights between the guardians that have to impose limits on alcohol, time to come back from parties, smoking weed or anything in the house or anywhere leads to a sensation of relief when this clash is over…

The film is not just about the relationship between widowed man – his wife had died – and motherless daughter, for they visit with relatives and the theme of racism, intolerance is exposed through Arie, a fundamentalist on this side of the divide, upset for good reason though when a monument is almost destroyed, though his explanations, rants, abuses and disgusting racism and intolerance are there on scree to show us how terrible this attitude can be…

luni, 10 februarie 2020

Crossfire, written by John Paxton, based on the novel by Richard Brooks - 10 out of 10


Crossfire, written by John Paxton, based on the novel by Richard Brooks
10 out of 10


Crossfire is a magnificent , exalting, admirable motion picture, included on the New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list - https://www.listchallenges.com/new-york-times-best-1000-movies-ever-made/list/5 - for being in so many ways the perfect feature, with an alert pace, from the opening scenes, which set audiences on the edge of the seats, for a man is killed in the first few seconds and the quest for the killer proves to be an intriguing, psychological, intelligent narrative.

Samuels is the man that had just been murdered, when the police arrive on the scene and the man leading the investigation, captain Finlay aka formidable Robert Young, will have to be diligent, intuitive, industrious, emotionally intelligent – EQ appears to be more important than IQ – and perhaps to an important degree…negative – positive psychology studies have demonstrated that in most professions, the positive mind works miracles, obtaining beside a longer, healthier, more successful private life, a much more efficient professional life as well.
Nonetheless, there are some domains where a ‘negative mindset’ looks like it is not just the ordinary condition – in one of the lectures, if my memory does not fail, it must have been at Harvard, professor Tal Ben-Shahar, there is the case of the financial analyst who presents to the spouse the chart of her minor (I guess) failings, as a result of a ‘professional defect’ – but the condition sine qua non…

A detective needs to be negative, because while experiments demonstrate that the positive individuals have a better ‘wide picture’, when it comes down to details, the negative participants in studies see better than the others and thus, along with the cops, people in traffic controlling positions, analysts and lawyers have to be negative…the lawyers have the highest rates of suicide, depression and divorce in America…at least they used to have a couple of years ago.
Montgomery aka flawless Robert Ryan is the demobilized soldier that knocks at the door where the police try to establish the first facts connected with the death of Joseph Samuels, and he says he might have the wrong door, when Captain Finlay opens and then tries to find out more from what might be the first witness, or the first man who might have some clues as to what happened, if not during the killing, at least some time before that…

Montgomery has a version in which he has had some drinks at a bar, with Mitchell aka splendid George Cooper, Floyd and some others, when they met with the deceased, evidently a civilian the soldier would say with some (High?) degree of contempt – he also adds, you know them when you see them Captain or words to that effect.
This witness would have most of this ‘testimony’ later, when meeting with the captain at his office, explaining further that they went to have some drinks, join a ‘party’ at the house of Samuels, where he had spent some time, before leaving with and Mitchell was left behind, the man who becomes the main suspect, especially given the fact that he is absent, unaccounted for and the murder took place recently and only a short time after Montgomery allegedly left.

Keeley aka legendary Robert Mitchum – the star of many films, including Cape Fear http://realini.blogspot.com/2017/06/note-on-cape-fear-with-robert-de-niro.html - enters the frame and he would prove to be essential in solving the case, first defending the main and for some time apparently the only suspect, Mitchell, even organizing a team to help him find refuge, at least until his name is cleared, he would have had a chance to see and talk to his visiting wife, though the task proves difficult, almost impossible, given the fact that first the man does not remember what he has done after he had been intoxicated, but gradually he sees that he met with a ‘loose woman’, went to her apartment, where he met a very bizarre man.
The latter says he is the husband of Ginny, then he denies it, saying he has lied and he actually wants to marry her, only to refute that too, for who would like to be her spouse…however, this outré personage might prove to be if not crucial, at least a piece of the puzzle in solving the case, which could become very heavy against Mitchell, when his presumably only defense witness, Ginny, denies the facts he had laid out…

The zenith of the investigation is reached beyond the witnesses, timing, when Captain Finlay explains a brilliant analysis of the motive that must have driven the killer to murder a man he had not actually known, since it is clear that one of those involved is guilty and they had only met Samuels a very short while before and the detective reaches the conclusion that it must have been Hate, racism which cause the ghastly crime…
Indeed, Joseph Samuels was Jewish and thus the target of a maniac who hates his community and the captain makes the case by telling the story of his grandfather, who came to America from Ireland, after the devastating famine brought about by a potato crop failure on a massive scale, and at one time found that the crazy mobs were attacking Irish people as ‘papists, Catholics that are spies for the pope and other such crazy, vicious, hateful abuses’, and the grandfather was killed…

Captain Finlay masterly would then present what happens in the future, when any group could be abused, tortured and its members killed in huge numbers – in today’s America, Trump is the exponent and leader of fundamentalists that do not care about values anymore, his acquittal and later ranting, sacking of witnesses proves the level of injustice reached there…




duminică, 9 februarie 2020

Chan is Missing, written by Isaac and Wayne Wang, directed by the latter - Nine out of 10


Chan is Missing, written by Isaac and Wayne Wang, directed by the latter
Nine out of 10


The Perfect Film would have to check quite a few boxes these days, from a cast with women in the leading role – or roles – to the promotion of minorities, a crew led by a female or/and Asian, African American or Native American, perhaps Australian Aborigines, the villain roles would be conferred upon the white males –indeed, there are tens of millions in real life, in the US that have voted and alas will again for the Ultimate Dark though also Orange Vader – and the script – also concocted by people with a disability of some sort or another, or belonging to some challenged group – would emphasize the new rules and values – by the way, what are they, in the Brave New World where the world’s most prestigious – or is it ridiculous – legislative body, the American Senate, a proven extortionist, corrupt, crooked gangster is acquitted…

Chan is Missing has been included on The New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list - https://www.listchallenges.com/new-york-times-best-1000-movies-ever-made/list/4 - and it is a remarkable, black and white narrative about the missing character, Chan Hung, the quest led by Jo aka exceptional Wood Moy to find not just the man, but what he stands for, who he is…for that matter, it is an invitation to meditate on values, who we are, especially given the aforementioned fantastic developments, in an Awful New World, where cheating is not just ethical, but it seems to keep one on Top of the Free World – is it free under those circumstances – and even more, to make his future election more likely and encourage villainous, contemptible, mendacious, Wrong behavior and in site of what the enablers said, the Orange man had learned nothing, for he has just fired Vidman and Sondland.
Chan is Missing is also about politics, for there are events that may have led to, explain at least in part the disappearance of the mysterious man that involve demonstrations and protests, with people from the PLC or supporting it are in conflict with others, also Chinese, but from Taiwan and the battle between free and oppressed, or brain washed is at the heart of what is going on in the world at the present, where the Communists in China are censoring and tyrannizing their people, while in the USA, voters of the republican party, which is now the Trump cult, get their phony information from the likes of Fox and other ‘sources’ that peddle conspiracies and not say anything or simply demolish the truth.

Jo starts with the assurance that Chan is worth looking for and he goes to an impressive extent to find the man, talking with everyone who would listen and even those who would not, like the neighbor who would not open the door – there is more than a passing hint at racism and intolerance, which is again what Trump’s America is all about – to talk to Jo and his colleague, the other ‘amateur detective’.

As it suits an intellectual movie, made with an astonishing budget of presumably $ 20,000 – granted, it was 1982, when this meant perhaps the huge sum of $ 100,000 and motion pictures could be made for much less and with a different quality that that of Avengers and other comic book blockbusters – Chan is Missing follows the change in the mind set, the image of the world and the people that live in it and Chan moves away from the kind, near perfect figure and though he is not becoming a horrible mass killer, we no longer know who he really is, or was, if he never returns or is found.
Ultimately, we can take this as a paradigm, the epitome of the challenge written in the pronaos of the Temple of Apollo at Delphi, “Know Thyself”, for in trying to find Chan, the protagonists of the ‘man hunt’ are exploring the personality of the missing man, they become defined in rapport with him, the public is also involved in a psychological search game – for the Trump world, the equivalent would be the Deep State, the way they try to figure out new conspiracies, enemies within the Congress, from brave, splendid Nancy Pelosi to the outstanding Adam Schiff, targets of abuse and loathing from the Idiots whose minds are missing.


sâmbătă, 8 februarie 2020

Clueless, written and directed by Amy Heckerling - Nine out of 10


Clueless, written and directed by Amy Heckerling
Nine out of 10


Clueless is a charming, amusing, fresh, creative, smart comedy that has been included on The New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list - https://www.listchallenges.com/new-york-times-best-1000-movies-ever-made/list/5 - and it is indeed a definite pleasure to watch.

Alicia Silverstone is resplendent as Cher, the main character of the motion picture, not the celebrated singer-actress, a rich, spoiled, somewhat innocent girl, but also ignorant as in ‘ignorance is like a delicate, exotic fruit, touch it and the boom is gone’, The Importance of Being Earnest, Oscar Wilde, and she provides quite a few interesting, mirthful scenes when she reveals she has no idea where one country or another is…perhaps Myanmar is mentioned and she places it in…the Middle East.
She does quite poorly in school, especially in the class of Mr. Wendell Hall aka the wonderful Wallace Shawn, admired in such great movies as My dinner with Andre and Vanya on 42nd Street - http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/06/vanya-on-42nd-street-based-on-uncle.html - because the teenager is nice, friendly – though to begin with, not with Travis and others that she sees as beneath her – but also rather superficial, incurious as to geography, serious debate and perhaps or most likely most, if not all subjects.

She is very interested in shopping and the ,all appears to be the therapy temple, in one of the many amusing moments, she has just been through some adversity, when she passes in front of a shop with shoes or maybe some other fashion apparel and although she had just reached a nadir of some kind, she stops and the call of a shopping moment is irresistible – as in Confessions of a Shopaholic http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/09/confessions-of-shopaholic-based-on.html - and thus she is soothed when she walks out of the Temple with a rewarding, Xanax type of bag.
Cher is very kind – well, up to the point where for instance helping her friend get the boy she has just discovered she might be infatuated with might compromise her future romance – taking care of her morose, yet so comical lawyer father, who has to eat healthier food and has his daughter ready to nudge him, she also tries almost everything to help the new girl, Tai aka Brittany Murphy, have the romantic dreams come true, even pushing Elton literally and figuratively to date her, drive her home, to get close to her.

Then Josh aka very young, wonderful Paul Rudd, comes to the huge mansion, almost a palace, to stay with his father and an interesting dynamic develops between brother and sister, awkward for this viewer for a short while, because paying little attention, he first missed on the detail of the connection between the main personages, who have no biological parent in common, for though they share the same father, he is a step parent for the boy and thus the developing attraction has nothing perverse or incestuous about it…well, maybe it has, who knows what is in the mind of Clueless people.
Which brings me to the spoiler alert part, the portion of the note where nothing is revealed about what happens, that is anyway pretty clear, given that this is a romantic comedy and not a horror feature, but the undersigned would just venture off into the wild on the political, democracy message that the movie does not have, but some bizarre audience may still get…

Clueless…this seems to be what a large portion of America is in the present, the one that had elected a Senseless buffoon – perhaps we should put that in all caps, as he does so often in his idiotic tweets – and seems very close to put him for four more years in the highest office, as if they had seen nothing of the lawless, immoral, erratic, criminal, vicious, disgusting manifestations of a man with Clear mental problems, who has just fired Colonel Vidman – a decorated man, who fought in war, unlike the coward with bone spurs and vindictive, stupid personality – and his buddy, Sondland…
This may well represent the Decay, Downfall of America, for they are not interested in the truth anymore – again, this is for the Trump supporters, who may have the upper hand in November – they worship a cretin, a fool who should be in care – perhaps intensive care – for his Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Schizophrenia, Paranoia, Dementia and the other disturbing ailments he clearly manifests on a daily basis…

Instead of prison, they push him into the Oval Office…
Clueless and over sixty million…