joi, 1 februarie 2018

Una, written by David Harrower, based on his play Blackbird

Una, written by David Harrower, based on his play Blackbird


                What a strange work!

Let me be clear: I do not think I understand what was going on in this film and what exactly the ensemble wanted to convey.
It may be one of those cases where this is actually an invitation to think and the artwork depends on the viewer…

It has been said that the onlooker is often, maybe always more important than the object of art itself

So if I dismiss this and say, well this is about a much older person who took advantage of a minor and his punishment, it could be a mistake.
Or not…

This film has some major attributes.
One of them is the actor in the leading role:

Ben Mendelsohn aka Ray

His work is outstanding, at least in two major productions that gave the public an idea of what this artist can do:

The phenomenal Animal Kingdom and more recently, the fabulous
Killing Them Softly

Having stated my admiration for the leading actor, I now must say that his contribution was nearly annulled by the other protagonist:

Rooney Mara

This artiste has a way of making me want to change the channel, even when she is in the company of big names.
Take Carol:

Even if the story was interesting, worthwhile and provoking, Rooney Mara has almost eliminated any pleasure.
It is also true that Cate Blanchet does not have the same appeal for this viewer as she used to possess.

Rooney Mara gives me the impression that she is over reaching; there is a sense of artificiality in her performance.
It is very likely that I am wrong and the parts require a certain awkwardness and what I call over the top is actually perfect planning.

Nevertheless, Una would have benefited from the presence of Eva Green or Kelly Reilly in my opinion.
Una comes to face Ray, many years after – I do not know how to describe this, the first impulse was to say-they have had an affair.

Una was very young, under age at the time and as aforementioned, it would be easy to dismiss this as an abuse.
Which in many ways it is, perhaps this is the main problem of this motion picture that it tries to complicate what seems so simple.

We have a much older man involved with a teenage girl and even if the latter thinks she loves him, it is a no go.
To try and analyze, tell the story could be liberal and open minded, but is it really the right thing to do?

Perhaps…

A comedian in disrepute-, which may highlight the problem of treating too lightly a serious, moral and life issue-, was talking about the need to understand and engage with a child kidnapper, if only to get to save the children involved.
In other words, Una may serve as a case study of what happens when a minor thinks she or he loves and older man.

Of course, it is much more complicated than that, for the film takes place more in the moment when the protagonists are adults and they look at this past, but I see the premise as paramount.
In many ways, it reminded me of Jagten aka The Hunt, wherein a much smaller child accuses a man of inappropriate behavior, almost ruining the life of an innocent person by just inventing a story.

Nevertheless, Jagten was in a completely different league, with a different take and a more meaningful subject.


miercuri, 31 ianuarie 2018

The Ipcress File with Michael Caine

The Ipcress File with Michael Caine


The Ipcress File has won the BAFTA Awards for Best Film and was nominated for the most prestigious cinema prize:

The Palme d’Or

In 1966, this was a tough competition, with motion pictures like:

Darling
The Hill

Michael Caine, one of the best actors that British cinema has given the world, was nominated for:

The BAFTA Award for Best British Actor, for his portrayal of Harry Palmer, the main character of this spy story

This film has a familiar story, but the magic rests in the manner of rendering the narrative on to the big screen.
In addition, Michael Caine is excellent in the title worker.

A number of leading British and other Western scientists have been kidnapped and their return is confusing.
One of them for instance is a reputed professor and comes back to address a panel of colleagues.

He starts his address and then stops in the middle of his second sentence.
Amnesia appears to be the cause.
However, the British Intelligence is working on this issue and has understood what happened in large part.

Moreover, they are not the only ones following the developments, since the CIA has sent agents in the field.
Harry Palmer is the hero of the film and he has a very appealing, amusing at times presence and actions.

He is not James Bond or Ethan Hunt, but he is a rebel and there are resemblances with these other, more famous spies.
Actually, his superior officer relies on the independent spirit of this agent to uncover an inside conspiracy.

For some time, these notes have been looking at the Character Strengths that film heroes have or miss.
Harry Palmer shows:

Bravery, Creativity, Persistence, Integrity, Curiosity, Open- mindedness, Love of learning, Perspective
Citizenship, Fairness, perhaps not so much Prudence and Mercy…

He is also strong on:

Self-regulation, Humor, Hope, Gratitude, Appreciation of Excellence, Social Intelligence, Kindness and Vitality

In his past, Harry Palmer has been on the wrong side of the law, dealing in the black market in Germany.
He was offered a deal- work with the Secret Intelligence Service or go to prison for some years.

With humor, he says:

“And the food is terrible in jail”

One of his hobbies or passions is cooking and enjoying good food, so eating the penitentiary meals must have seemed awful.
Harry Palmer is soon on the tracks of the main suspect and he finds a lot of information…so much that he is kidnapped.

He shows resilience and an incredible strain, his loyalty being put to the test, under the most difficult circumstances.

The Ipcress File is a very good motion picture.

The Guardian, with Kevin Costner

The Guardian, with Kevin Costner


The subject of this film is familiar, but it still makes for a meaningful, gripping story.

In addition, I believe Kevin Costner is excellent.
I can't say that about his partner, Kushner.

In fact, I have such an allergy to the latter that I stopped watching Two and a Half Men, when he took the stage.
I see him as over the to, artificial.

Without him, The Guardian would have been so much better.
For this viewer anyway.

The motion picture dives straight into action.
Literally.

In the first few scenes, the hero, a Coast Guard rescuer, jumps from a helicopter into the rough waters of the Ocean.
A couple is there and they could very well drown, in the next couple of minutes.

It is a climax reached after a few minutes into the film.
Nevertheless, this is not the only one.

The husband is trying hard to get into the cage that takes victims from the water.
The Guardian tells him that he will take the wife first.

The man would not listen.
The hero has to get rough, but it is still without effect.

In fact, the husband is pushing the spouse into the depth of the ocean.
And the rescuer has to dive to get her.

Incredible!
In some way, the film could be over after these few moments.

So much was packed inside that it felt fulfilling and exhilarating.

Later on, the hero explains to his wife that:

The man was driven by the survival instinct.
It is natural.

The scene has reminded me of a Nordic film wherein an avalanche hits the hotel and the man runs for his life, abandoning wife and children.

The Guardian explains to his wife that he realized something of vital importance:

He was doing the same thing to her...
Pushing his wife to suffocate and die.

Not in water and without intent.
But with the same effect.

It is an awkward, poignant and remarkable moment.
This man is actually ready to sacrifice his life to save others!

What more could one do?!
It is the ultimate Role Model!

The Ubermensch!
Superman without the cape, with the diving costume.

And yet, he realized that being always on call, he made his own wife suffer.
He is on duty and in danger all the time.

And she cannot cope with that.
She needs a husband.

Not a dead body...even that could be denied, if his corpse is taken by the ocean.
So the protagonist understands, belatedly, that his spouse needs him.

However, when the call comes and he has the chance to save his best student, the Guardian does not hesitate for a moment.
And this notwithstanding the fact that he had discovered that he has some limitations now, with age and all that work and effort, he had been ready and had resigned his post.

The Guardian has all the imaginable Character strengths.

Bravery, Persistence, Love, Hope, Gratitude, Citizenship, Modesty, Fairness, Self-regulation, Vitality and the list would never end.

There are other , more popular films that are similar in some ways to this very good motion picture:

Full Metal Jacket and Biloxi Blues are just two of them.

The end of the film is also interesting, without having the sweet, banal conclusion that we are so used with.


luni, 29 ianuarie 2018

Michael the Brave aka Mihai Viteazul, writer Titus Popovici

Michael the Brave aka Mihai Viteazul, writer Titus Popovici


This film used to be such an entertainment and somewhat miraculous achievement…when I was about ten…
Maybe twelve.

However, as time goes by, we become wiser, most of us, and capable to distinguish value from junk.
This is not to say that Michael the Brave is garbage.

In fact, there are many Character Strengths that both the main character and the actor playing it have:
Amza Pellea is portraying this Wallachian Prince and the former has been one of the best actors we ever had.

Michael the Brave used to be celebrated as one of the most, if not the most important of all rulers.
Communists, nationalists used to, and are still religiously admiring leaders that they say promoted the “nation”.

This prince has miraculously united the three provinces that make up Romania today, but had been ruled as separate lands for centuries.
Corrupt or just mistaken historians have attributed this achievement to noble ideas related to one people, one country.

Only the reality was different.
Most likely, Michael the Brave was much more interested in gaining more power and taking control of a large territory.

His motives must have been more tactical, military, diplomatic and political than idealistic nationalism.

Michael the Brave was one of the elements, historical figures that have been used to create a glorious scenario.
In that version of history, which is alas still a holy text for so many lost cases here, the Austrians have been saved by…us.

Perhaps even the French and the Germans!
Because we stood watch over here and protected the Christian West!

The advancing Turkish, Ottoman hordes had to fight us!
In addition, we have so often defeated them!

Alhamdulillah!
This is of course just nonsense.

However, Michael the Brave is part of that proposition and the film is supposed to glorify and consecrate the character.
Having said that, I must now emphasize that this was not some silly puppet, maneuvered by the Ottoman sultan.

Here are just some of the Signature Strengths demonstrated by this phenomenal military and political leader:

Bravery, Creativity, Open-mindedness, Perspective-well, up to a point-Leadership, Mercy, sometimes,
Persistence, Curiosity, Vitality, Social Intelligence, Hope, Spirituality, Integrity-to a great extent

As a ruler of a small territory, surrounded by enemies like the mighty Ottoman Empire and the Austro- Hungarian one, choices were bad.

The film portrays military victories that, even if exaggerated by propaganda motives or just silly belief, did exist.
Michael the Brave, Mircea the Old, Steven the Great are just three of the many princes that had to face the Turks.

Their victories must be noted and to a degree admired, but we must not live in a past that is magnified and finally discredited.
Yes, we did try to maintain independence, but faced with a much bigger force we mostly failed.


Nevertheless, Michael the Brave can serve as a role model, but only if we also admit his shortcomings.

duminică, 28 ianuarie 2018

Get Out, written and directed by Jordan Peele

Get Out, written and directed by Jordan Peele


Get Out is acclaimed as one of the best films of 2017, nominated for Golden Globes and four Oscars…
In addition, some of the most important ones at that:

Best Motion Picture of the Year, Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role, Best Achievement in Directing and
Best Original Screenplay.

In my opinion, there are small chances for the film to win in any of the categories, albeit Moonlight was an outsider last year.
For this viewer it was lucky that the information that this is a horror film was missing initially, for I would have a different, negative mindset, for I tend not to watch this genre of motion pictures…

-          What am I saying, I never watch horror knowingly…
-          Well, if it is appreciated as one of the best movies of the year, it must be noticed and watched, at least for some minutes

Get Out starts out reasonably and it continues like that, on the horrifying front anyway, where there is not much to terrify audiences.
We have a deer that dies, when the car of the protagonists hit it on the road and the poor animal makes a very upsetting, painful sound.

Moreover, this happens in the first few minutes, while white Rose Armitage aka Allison Williams drives Chris Washington aka the Oscar nominated Daniel Kaluuya to her parents’ home in the country.
Chris is African American and much of the story revolves around that, from the moment when he asks his girlfriend if her parents are aware that he is black.

After they hit the deer, they call the police and the white man of the law asks for the ID of the man in the car…

“Why are you asking for his ID? He wasn’t driving?” Is a reasonable attitude, although the policeman explains that this is standard procedure after an accident happens…only the fact that he is asking an African American raises a question, or more

Once they arrive at the estate, where there is a large, luxurious mansion and a sizeable property, a series of strange incidents start to happen, some of which made me smile, again, not knowing this is actually a horror film.
The parents are apparently friendly and accommodating, albeit in an outré manner and Missy Armitage, the mother, is soon somewhat harsh with the African American servant who spills some tea.

Missy is a psychiatrist and the father, Dean, is a surgeon who quickly asks if Chris is smoking and specifies that the analyst of the family had cured him, through hypnosis, making him sick at the thought of cigarettes.
During the night, the guest walks out to smoke a cigarette, observing the weird behavior of the maid and being almost run over by the gardener, who is also African American, at least in appearance, while he is jogging…in the middle of the night.

On the next day, a large group of guests arrives for the annual party and they all act like if this is a Vampire Ball, one of them measuring the muscles on Chris ‘arms, another saying that Black is in fashion.
The only other African American at this shindig acts in a way that suggests he is either hypnotized or…someone else is in control of his mind.

Chris is intrigued and more and more suspicious of all this “paranormal” activity until a nadir is reached.
The “brother” who seems to be “owned” by a rather corpulent, twice as old woman has a strange breakdown:

When Chris uses the flash of his phone, the only other African American guest attacks him viciously.
This is explained as an effect of the epilepsy that is plaguing the young man, but The hero knows about this disease and is convinced the clarification is actually a lie and in line with all the “shit” that has been going on at this weird place.

When he understands that something awful is taking place, after finding on the internet about the identity of the “epileptic” man, who has been missing for some years, after a career as a jazz musician in New York and is now transformed into a completely different, outlandish “sex slave”, Chris decides to leave right away.
Rose says she loves him and shows compassion, while deciding to find an excuse and leave the parents’ house earlier.

This is where it becomes terrifying and without going into details, I will just say that Things Fall Apart.

Get Out is a good motion picture, notwithstanding the fact that it is not really my cup of tea and some propositions are preposterous…

sâmbătă, 27 ianuarie 2018

The Godfather: Part II, based on the novel by Mario Puzo

The Godfather: Part II, based on the novel by Mario Puzo

The Godfather Part II is an exhilarating, magnificent chef d’oeuvre, one of the best ten films ever made.

Some feminists criticize this work of art as expressing the male admiration for a violent mobster.
Even if there is some grain of truth in that statement, the reality is much more complex, like the protagonist of the motion picture.

Michael Corleone is the Godfather in this sequel to the other masterpiece, wherein Marlon Brando was Vito Corleone.
In addition, this is both a hero and the evil character, making the film so much more interesting, with his complicated personality.

Some of the Character Strengths that the leader of one of the most powerful Mafia families has are:

-          Bravery, Curiosity, Persistence, Perspective, even Citizenship at the time of his volunteer enrollment in the army
-          Also Leadership, Vitality, Love, Social Intelligence, Appreciation of Beauty and Excellence, Gratitude…

Some, if not most of these qualities have helped him keep control of the organization and diversify the operations.
However, it is also difficult to appreciate this powerful personality since these skills have been put to the wrong use.

Moreover, it could all have been so different.
One of the most powerful scenes in the movie takes place decades in the past, on the birthday of Vito Corleone.

It was also the day of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and this is the subject of conversation at the table.

Sonny is meant to be the future Godfather and in the same room, we have Fredo, Tom Hagen, Connie and Michael.
The elder brother is convinced that the many thousands that have volunteered to fight the enemy are stupid.

Nevertheless, Michael emphasizes that they will fight for their country and that appears to be the noble thing to do…

-          Fight for strangers?...you fight for your family- that appears to be the credo as expressed by Vito Corleone himself
-          To fight for the country is the right thing to do
-          Yeah? Why don’t you skip college and join the army then!?
-          I did…
-          What?! You idiot…these are not quotes, but the dialogue as I remember it

Then tom Hagen is expressing amazement and he says:

-          Why didn’t you come to us?
-          What for?
-          Your father has pulled a lot of strings to save you from joining
-          I did not ask for that
-          Your father has talked a lot about your future with me…
-          My future?
-          Yes, he has such high hopes for you Michael…

The always impulsive and neurotic Sonny tries to beat his younger brother, but this is so relevant and thought provoking.
In The first part of The Godfather, Michael talks to Kate at the memorable wedding and states clearly that, although his family has this very dark side, he is not like that and he has other ideals.

Therefore, it is so ironic that the young idealist, who saw himself so different from his siblings and father, ends up running the family “business”.

The values of the young Michael Corleone have all vanished? Alternatively, is this just a case of a found identity?
This of course makes the plot and this phenomenal film so much appealing, with its intricate philosophical issues.

The film that the popular vote on IMDB has placed at number three is not just a gangster movie, violent and simple.
The Godfather is an example of failure, for his marriage is finished under the most gruesome circumstances, his brother Fredo is killed, and the family name is tarnished when a Senate investigation is opened.


The Godfather: Part II is a glorious, phenomenal motion picture.

Notes on a Scandal, based on the novel by Zoe Heller

Notes on a Scandal, based on the novel by Zoe Heller

This good film benefits from the performances of the brilliant

Judi Dench, now Dame, and Cate Blanchett.
Bill Nighy is also excellent.

Dame Judi Dench portrays a teacher, Barbara, which has one year or so before retirement.
In her school, a new colleague is played by Cate Blanchett.

This younger professor is called Sheba.
She has trouble facing the noisy, often rude and belligerent students.

One day, Barbara is passing by the class where a fight is in progress.
She comes in, establishing order again and takes the two boys out for scolding.

Barbara is very friendly and amiable.
The younger teacher invites the senior to her house.

Sheba is married to a much older man, Richard aka Bill Nighy.
They have two children, a girl and a boy who is autistic.

The motion picture has a voice over and Barbara is the one telling the story or the

Notes on a Scandal

We gradually understand that Barbara has more than just a "normal, usual" interest in helping a younger, charming colleague.
Details of a previous relationship with a woman come forward.

This film is exceptional and the slow access into the intimacy of the protagonists is part of the secret of its success.
Barbara is just about sure that her friendship with Sheba is set to become ever more resplendent.

During a school play, the older teacher reserves a seat next to her for her friend.
But when the latter does not come, she starts looking.

This is one climax or the nadir of the story, depending on how you look at it.

For in a room near the school, Sheba and the fifteen year old Steven are having...sex!
The older woman is flabbergasted!

Outraged, she is facing her younger colleague and threatens:

You end this now, or I will inform the school master!
Yes, I will!

Barbara is then playing the role of the confidant.
Tell me all about it.

The boy is only fifteen, but so adult in his manner.
He insisted, sent messages and finally seduced his teacher.

If we are to take this view, of course.
It is clear now that Barbara is a lesbian, attracted to the beautiful, younger woman.

She sees this as the amazing chance to play all this adversity and trauma to her advantage.
In the end, Sheba will see that her family, husband and kids are not her happiness.

She will move with Barbara and they will live happily ever after.
Or so the latter thinks.

And all is well for a while.
Until Barbara sees the young man in the garden of her friend.

She is out of her mind with fury.
Threats, blackmail and many scenes follow.

Sheba has not ended her affair with the fifteen year old!

One of the school teachers comes to Barbara to confess that he is in love with Sheba and to ask for advice.
This is another nadir.

The disappointed woman throws the bomb...
Sheba appears to like much younger men, boys really...

They say that she has an affair with this pupil...Steven.

All hell breaks loose.
The boy's mother comes to Sheba's house and starts knocking her about.

Whore! How could you do that! And many expletives are shouted.
The authorities place the teacher under accusation.

Mass media gathers at the gate and of course, the husband is mad.
Barbara has to face consequences too.

The headmaster gives her the option to retire earlier or face the storm.
Barbara has had a very rocky, to put it mildly, relationship with her previous love interest.

The other younger teacher has gone to a solicitor who has sent restricting orders.
Barbara has threatened that woman's boyfriend and has really been more than a nuisance.


Notes on a Scandal is an exhilarating drama