vineri, 16 februarie 2018

Capturing Mary, written and directed by Stephen Poliakoff


Capturing Mary, written and directed by Stephen Poliakoff


Capturing Mary is an interesting, pleasant film that has alas attracted very little, indeed, almost no attention.

On the most popular movies site- IMDB- there are only fifteen users that have expressed an opinion.
Furthermore, there are an unbelievable number of external reviews: just two critics have reviewed this work.

                Well, this is going to be three now.

                The legendary Maggie Smith plays the role of Mary Gilbert.
                She is a woman of…well, should I venture and place a figure here?

                Let us just say that the lady in question is at a very advanced age, or just passed the middle    age?
She comes by a mansion where she used to attain parties in her youth and knocks at the door.

Joe, a young man who appears to be somewhat special or challenged, slow to catch on at times, opens the door.
After some hesitation, he allows the older lady to come into the house and he becomes ever more hospitable.

He offers the visitor some tea and while she was reminiscing about the past, she spills a lot of milk on the tiled floor.
Images from the past are appearing before her eyes, from the days when they were feting around this small palace.

In these ample, beautiful rooms, she was enjoying good music, food and illustrious guests that she mentions.

One could never tell if that was Alfred Hitchcock sitting on a chair, Ava Gardener behind a curtain.
Other writers and famous intellectuals attended these celebrations- E. M. Forster and Evelyn Waugh among them.

However, Mary Gilbert is fascinated with some other figure from the past.
Greville White has mesmerized her.

David Walliams portrays this character.
For this viewer, it feels awkward to watch this performance from the actor who became familiar from:

Little Britain

Type casting is wrong.
In addition, David Walliams takes the part seriously; indeed, he is perhaps too pompous in some scenes.

That could all be justified, as Greville is an unusual, mysterious, outré personage that acts in a peculiar manner.
At one moment, he meets in the kitchen with Mary and invites her to share his meal: a…salad that he makes himself.

He then takes her to the wine cellar that he knows much better than the owner, who allows him to take precious, unique wines at home.
Nevertheless, the knowledge that this man has covers more important territory, for he is acquainted with leaders and ruling classes.

He has some very despicable stories to tell, including one in which rulers say about the Nazi concentration camps that the Jewish people have brought this calamity upon themselves…or words to that effect.

It does not get any better, as other inside stories reveal other aspects of racism, with figureheads talking about Africans:

They will not be able to handle it, once we retreat…again, this is not a quote, but it renders the image.

Mary is haunted by the figure of Greville. She even thinks she sees him in a park, only she is passed her prime, while he has the same exact age he had when they first met…
Capturing Mary is …captivating and entertaining.









Like Water for Chocolate, screenplay by Laura Esquivel, based on her novel


Like Water for Chocolate, screenplay by Laura Esquivel, based on her novel


                This viewer has made some mistakes in connection with this film.

Therefore, the note on Like Water for Chocolate is probably not just biased, but wrong as well.
After all, most critics have loved it; the Metascore on IMDB shows an impressive and hard to believe:

                86!

                This means observers have not just liked this, but they were enchanted and mesmerized by Water and Chocolate.
                In addition, the motion picture was nominated for the Golden Globe and BAFTA for the very reputable:

                Best Foreign Film Award

                Nevertheless, this viewer was not thrilled.
Indeed, the reaction of the Roman Emperor from Mel Brooks’ History of the World, a formidable comedy applies:

“Nice…not thrilling, but nice”

Dom DeLuise aka the emperor was saying that in front of an immense, bulging coffer with diamonds, jewels brought to him as war plunder.
One element can impair, sometimes destroy altogether the pleasure of watching a film:

The awful procedure is called dubbing

The way Like Water was presented was in a format with artificial, ridiculous voice-overs that sounded pathetic.
Hence, it could be argued that the film is magical, maybe hypnotizing when you see and hear it in the original Spanish.

In an altered version, it sounds like hell.
On a positive note: we are so lucky in this land not to have to listen to a local version of movies and we just read subtitles and hear the original language.

Tita is the girl and them woman at the core of this interesting if not ebullient story that takes place in Mexico.
In her family, there is a cruel, preposterous tradition that has one daughter sacrificed to take care of her mother.

It reminds one of the ancient, sadistic habits of the Egyptians, Chinese and others who buried wives, servants with the dead master.
Only Tita is supposed to be buried and to keep living near her parent, without a possibility to marry.

When Pedro falls in love with the girl, he takes his father to do the proper thing and ask the mother for the hand.
Mother Elena accepts the proposal, with a sick twist, convincing the young man to marry…another daughter.

He says that he has done that only to be close to the woman he loves, but one could be suspicious of that.
If we would take a cynic or a comedian ‘view on this, we might suggest that the cheeky rascal had something else in mind:

Ménage a trois?
The fact is that both his legal and granted, imposed spouse and the sister in law get pregnant, or so we think…

The truth is more complex and I will not introduce any spoilers or alerts for this or other elements of the plot.
Let us just say that the Marquis De Sade in his feminine apparition has some very despicable, heinous attitudes towards her own daughter.

Comb my hair, give me a towel, iron my shirt, and close the door! You want me to get pneumonia?!




Peter’s Friends, written by Rita Rudner and Martin Bergman


Peter’s Friends, written by Rita Rudner and Martin Bergman


                What a phenomenal cast!

                Emma Thompson, Hugh Laurie, Stephen Fry, Imelda Staunton, Kenneth Branagh…
The latter is also directing this not very well known film

It is New Year’s Eve.
Six friends get together to celebrate.

This is supposed to be quite a fete.
The setting is majestic, luxuriant.

The always-sparkling Stephen Fry portrays Peter Morton, the man from the title.
Only we do not know that for some time.

Peter has inherited an impressive, exquisite property where he is thrilled to invite his friends from Cambridge.
The issues of these people will be funny at times, depressing at other and overall a challenge to deal with.

Kenneth Branagh, the director is Andrew in the motion picture.
He is married to Carol, an American actress with an apparently difficult personality and a tendency to eat a lot.

Indeed, one night she empties the whole, large refrigerator which was filled with food for the whole party of six.
However, almost all the protagonists are not one-dimensional and have complex profiles and this is what makes the story interesting.

Carol is obsessed with her professional life, appearance, celebrity material and her career, but this is not all.
She helps Emma Thompson aka Maggie Chester get over her deception that involves Peter and his attitude.

-          Talk to me Maggie…I am the expert…analysts call me for advice!
-          He says he is gay
-          Tell me about it…I was married to one
-          Really? What happened?
-          He left me

Hugh Laurie alias Roger is married to Mary aka Imelda Staunton and their problem is being centered on their kids.
Well, Mary is concerned with what the children do and if the baby sitter is able to handle them.

To the point of madness…

Sarah is another one of the Cambridge friends and the circle had considered her a sort of a nymphomaniac, out of the Lars von Trier series, before their time…
Only this was her way of trying to find emotion, affection, acceptance, warmth, companionship…

Sarah has arrived here with a…dick.
No, I am exaggerating of course.

However, the woman is confusing sex with the real thing.
Unable to find fulfilment in the series of short, carnal relations she has with various men, she quickly has a clash with them.
Besides, the current lover has a wife and children and gets emotional and ridiculous in conversations with them, on the phone.

However, the blow comes from Peter.
That is the nadir and the climax of the film.

He reveals a truth that I cannot uncover here without a spoiler alert and what would be the point of that here.
We have reached the end of the note anyway and the conclusion is that this is not the best production in which you can admire any of the stars of the cast, but it probably is the only one where you can see them all together.

joi, 15 februarie 2018

The Post, director Steven Spielberg, with Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks


The Post, director Steven Spielberg, with Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks

                The Post is the best film of 2017…

                Steven Spielberg, Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks!

                The Post has the magic formula, the nec plus ultra of cinema!
With the crème de la crème responsible for this motion picture, almost nothing can go wrong and all is exceptional.

Indeed, this is a film that can serve as a lesson for ethics, morals, virtues classes and the main characters are role models.
They have almost all- perhaps the entire spectrum- the Signature Strengths identified by Professor Martin Seligman:

Curiosity, Fairness, Bravery, Hope, Gratitude, Appreciation of Beauty and Excellence, Citizenship
Open-mindedness, Self-regulation, Justice, Spirituality, Wisdom, Temperance, Vitality, Perseverance

This masterpiece reminds one of another monumental work of art:

All the President’s Men

Moreover, this viewer has been expecting from the start of the film to see the infamous Watergate scandal erupting.
There is mention of it and it is fabulous, although I will not say when and how this happens, just that is miraculous, so wonderful it is placed.

The investigation at the core of this film is worthy of the best journalism that uncovers the truth and censors politicians and leaders.
It is so crucial currently when media is under such a terrible assault from the likes of lying Trump, Russian agents that pay adds to influence elections (and are involved in other nefarious activities).

A couple of years ago, another splendid investigation inspired the Oscar winner for Best Film, Spotlight.
The Post has the Pentagon Papers at the center, documents taken out from the headquarters of the American Defense Department.

Those documents reveal that a series of American presidents have lied about Vietnam and the implications.
It is of paramount importance to let the public know about all this, only it interferes with other interests, such as to protect State Secrets and national security, with law courts ordering a stop to the publication of these dossiers.

Therefore, journalists, editors and managers of The Post face a prison sentence when they decide to publish anyway, putting what they see as the nation’s right to know and amendments of the constitution ahead of personal risks.
Lawyers argue that the danger is too high to ignore and their clients need to stop the release of secret papers.

The heroes also have to face the consequences of their dangerous decisions on the finances of The Post.
This remarkable media outlet had been engaged, before the most popular journalistic investigation of all time, The Watergate break in and the resulting resignation of the American President, the only one before Donald Trump (Insha’Allah!) to do so, in a battle of nerves with financial backers, government agencies, law courts and rivals waiting to see the Post fail.

After they get involved and cover this story that reveals so many shortcomings, blunders, lies and mistakes about Vietnam, an extraordinary solidarity and ethical, moral, virtuous attitude of newspapers is blooming.
In the époque of Fox News, Fox and Friends that are feeding this incredibly flawed clown with the sycophantic blabber he wants to see, audiences may have trouble understanding the move that almost all media outposts made to express solidarity with the Washington Post.

This is a magnificent, glorious, triumphant, formidable, authentic, epic story of an astonishing battle.
The fight to get the Truth out, no matter what the consequences are for personal fortune and liberty is an incredible spectacle to watch.

Protagonists are engaged in an outstanding conflict with powers that try to confiscate the truth.
Today, alas, people get the information they prefer= those watching Fox, Breibart and the like, hear nothing about Russia investigation, Stormy Daniels, wife beatings and all the scandalous rest coming from a White House turned Dark.

The Post is the best film of 2017.



Fargo by Ethan and Joel Coen


Fargo by Ethan and Joel Coen


The only shortcoming of this brilliant chef d’oeuvre is that some characters are too stupid to believe

“Oh, yeah?
Oh yeah!”

If in the Reservoir Dogs it was calculated that protagonist say fuck or another expletive every minute, in Fargo there is an “oh, yeah” every other…oh, fuck it!...way, way too often that is uttered here.
Apart from that, Fargo is an absolute masterpiece.

And even my silly attack on the film is pointless and wrong if we only consider the American 2016 elections.
The primitive, senseless troglodytes from Fargo have been voting in 2016 for someone who is qualified to watch the parking lot in Brainerd.

Furthermore, an unbelievable ninety per cent are happy with the attacks, monstrosities, Stormy Daniels, grabbing pussy, Russia collusion, parade and tyrant dreams, daily calamities that have been revealed, leaked, tweeted or just broadcast on the air often from the White House.
So…oh yeah?...oh yeah!

Jerry Lundegaard aka William H. Macy is a car salesman who has financial troubles but also a wondrous plan.
He hires two criminals to kidnap his wife, who will be released after his rich father-in-law pays the ransom.

This is the premise but it all goes wrong, first because all those involved are Trump voters, except perhaps the clever police officer.
Fargo is a hilarious comedy and not a thriller, in spite of the murders committed early on in the game.

After the criminals – one of them played perfectly by Steve Buscemi- take Jerry’s wife from her home, the law stops them.
Many others follow the first aggravating mistake of not putting registration plates on a car used in a felony; let us just mention the one where one killer is off in the neighborhood bragging about his murdering people.

When the police officer refuses to take the bride, the crazier of the kidnappers kills him and then another two personages that happened to be driving by and hence becoming witnesses of the murder.
Wade Gustafson is the father-in-law and boss of Jerry, who works in his car dealership, where he has some amusing scenes.

Gustafson is a feral, loathsome man who has however an understanding for the flawed character of his son in law.
The older man is the one who has to pay the ransom and he is adamant that he needs to be involved.

However, his insistence, foolishness and determination will get him into serious trouble with Carl Showalter.
Frances McDormand- nominated and probably the n umber one favorite in the Oscar’s race this year, 2018- portrays Marge Gunderson, the pregnant sheriff that has to find the killer or killers responsible for the increasing number of murders.

She has won the Academy Award for Best Actress in a Leading role for this excellent performance.
In addition, the film went on to win the Oscar for Best Writing, Screenplay and was nominated for a further five awards…

Best Picture, Best Actor in a Supporting Role- William H. Macy, Best Director- Joel Coen and two other.
As stated, the only misgiving seemed to be in regards with the too low IQ of most of those involved.

However, when most of those living in the Middle America are so enchanted with a buffoon, their IQ and EQ levels are low.
In addition, this explains the fact that a lot of what goes on, unbelievable as it may look, is in fact veridical.

Fargo is an august work of art that exposes stupidity and makes us laugh, even if there are bodies on the floor and in the…wood chipper

Mon Oncle d’Amerique aka My American Uncle, by Jean Gruault, Henri Laborit


Mon Oncle d’Amerique aka My American Uncle, by Jean Gruault, Henri Laborit


                My American Uncle is a formidable, jubilant film.

Alain Resnais directed it and in the leading role, we have the majestic Gerard Depardieu, in his glory days.
The plot is in fact a combination of stories, complex, sophisticated and mesmerizing, with psychoanalysis undertones.

To make the connection, perhaps to make the narratives more comprehensible, experiments are weaved in between.
One refers to Learned Pessimism, and rats are given electric shocks in their cage, with the possibility to escape the punishment offered in one instance.

However, when the animal is left with no choice, the door that he could access being closed, the result is disastrous.
They learn to be helpless and the effects on the organism is devastating, with terrible biological consequences.

The same thing happens to humans who see no way out of impossible situations and become pessimistic.
They can no longer face challenges and research has proved that this psychological helplessness leads to an inability to fight viruses, where a normal person can deter such a challenge, the helpless pessimist becomes very sick.

There is an alternative and the founder of Positive Psychology explains what one can do in the book:

Leaned Optimism by Martin Seligman

It is amusing and somewhat disturbing to see the main characters dressed like rats in various scenes.

This is to make the connection between studies of behavior, the answers to provocation in the animal and human world.
When the rats are alone in their cage and they are punished with electric shocks, they become helpless as aforementioned.

However, when another rat is placed in the same environment and electricity is used to shock them, they fight.
Astonishingly, those who have the opportunity to fight with an adversary do not have the same health problems as the lonely animals.

It means that if they have the chance to do something about the pain, they get over and do not get ill, as the helpless rats.
For humans, things are more complicated, the voice in the background of the film explains, because of social norms.

When they go through an important change and they feel punished, they cannot go and beat their opponent.
Although funny versions of various possibilities are offered in wonderful scenes from this masterpiece.

Rene Raguneau aka Gerard Depardieu is one of the protagonists of the film and he faces various provocations that take a toll on his mental and physical health, he has pains and a breakdown.
As the scientist that details the experiments points out, when humans cannot battle with others, they may turn against themselves; perhaps even commit suicide, which one of the characters tries.

Janine is another hero of the motion picture and she first tries to become an actress, then, after an initial success, she becomes the mistress of a very difficult, married man who is a big strain on anyone’s nerves.
That man’s wife waits in the corridor one day, to try to convince the lover to let the husband return home to his wife and children.

Seeing as the first demand has little echo, the wife explains that the man must come to his family.
She says that she has just learned that she is dying, she only has a short time before death and this is the winning argument.

Even if there are tragic events, some of them invented by the characters, this is a superb, jubilant comedy.
The confrontation between Rene and his new challenger is often hilarious, in spite of the fact that we feel sorry for the hero.

My American Uncle is on the list compiled by The New York Times: The New York Times ‘Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made:




Laura, based on the novel by Vera Caspary


Laura, based on the novel by Vera Caspary


                Laura is a fascinating thriller, but also a very good, complex love story.

                The debut of the film is intriguing.
                We see that the hero of the film is dead.

The motion picture is called Laura, hence that is the character it is supposed to be about and yet…she just died.

Laura Hunt was killed and a suspicious detective, Mark McPherson is in charge with the investigation.
He is questioning the entourage and everyone is a suspect, until the circle is narrowed down to the killer.

Mark McPherson appears to use the method patented by a brilliant psychologist called Amos Tversky:

Elimination by Aspects

The detective is in awe with the dead woman, who had been a very beautiful, gorgeous “dame”.
The latter is a word used by McPherson and he is ridiculed for that by another important character:

                Waldo Lydecker.
                This is a columnist with peculiar, pretentious attitude and habits.

He writes in his bath, thinks the world of himself and acts like a replica of Donald Trump, only with a vocabulary.

Indeed, the leader of the free world uses a very limited dictionary, of all presidents, the current one is at the level of a child, with his speech patterns.
Waldo Lydecker is obnoxious, self-absorbed, but he is well educated and responsible for the evolution of the hero.

The writer tells the story of Laura, her arrival at his lunch table, where she asked the famous journalist to endorse her work.

In the first instance, the self-indulgent man dismissed the woman, who then said she feels sorry for him.
She states that she thought he had feelings that she admired in his column, but it is now obvious he does not.

When she talks about emotions, the writer responds along the lines of: “yes, as long as they are paid with 50 cents the word”

Nevertheless, after this confrontation, the older man feels he had been overdoing his maleficence and tries to apologize.
An inappropriate bond develops, with the much older man becoming increasingly infatuated with Laura.

It is not very absurd, for there is a mentor quality in Waldo that benefits his friend who gains more knowledge.
However, the columnist is not satisfied with a platonic engagement and feels he has rights over his protégé.

When Laura sees other men, Waldo is infuriated and when she becomes too attached to Shelby Carpenter a climax is reached.
Without details that would constitute a spoiler alert, there are reasons to suspect the disappointed Waldo Lydecker.
Equally, Shelby Carpenter is not beyond any doubt, given the fact that he engaged in another relationship, while he was going to be married with the deceased.

A coup de theater arrives way before the end of this emotional drama, when the identity of the dead woman is discovered.
Laura was not dead, a young woman was murdered in her place, but the killer thought he was killing the person he loved…or maybe hated.

This is just one astonishing piece of the puzzle that detective McPherson has to elucidate to solve the murder mystery.
Laura is a jubilant love story on top of the crime narrative, for a true romance is born out of the horror of the early killing.