All the Money in the World based on the book by
John Pearson
This motion picture has probably had
more buzz surrounding the postproduction, re- shooting and financial aspects,
than discussion over the merits or lack thereof of a feature that has a
nomination for an Academy Award.
Christopher Plummer, at the age of
88 (!) has played the role of the obnoxious, despicable, greedy, and
psychopathic to a certain degree, richest man of his time and for all history
up to 1973- John Paul Getty.
Nevertheless, the excellent, veteran
Oscar winner and nominated for this part for another Academy Award for Best
Actor in a Supporting role and the oldest to get this nod, was not the first
choice, but came after director Ridley Scott had decided to replace the
original star, Kevin Spacey, in the aftermath of scandals surrounding his
alleged abuse of teenage boys.
The production has taken to re-shoot
the scenes involving John Paul Getty and called the other actors involved-
Michelle Williams as Gail Harris, the daughter in law of the villainous,
heartless tycoon and Mark Wahlberg as Fletcher Chase, the man who tries to help
the mother recuperate her son.
However, the new scenes were paid
with over one million- was it one point seven million dollars- in the case of
the male star and only with something like eighty dollars per day for Michele
Williams, a huge discrepancy that has highlighted yet again the discriminations
that women still have to face, even in highly paid positions.
Alas, some may feel that neither Ms.
Williams, nor Mark Wahlberg have had their best performances in this motion
picture about greed, love, hope, courage, vitality, recklessness, indifference and
humanity.
Early on, a group of criminals in
Italy abducts John Paul Getty III –portrayed by a promising artist called
Charlie Plummer- a coincidence, since he is not related to Christopher Plummer-.
One of the most important villains,
the one who will both assist the felons and try to help poor young John to
survive the ordeal and come out with as little trauma and physical damage as
possible, is played by one of the best actors in the world, Romain Duris aka
Cinquanta.
John Paul Getty is not just the
richest man in the world, but also a billionaire who has invested vast sums in
works of art- that have finally adorned the museum Getty, but only after his
demise-and he has a reputation as a savvy, well versed, knowledgeable
collector, who offers a gift to his favorite grandson.
This man is The Miser from the paly
by Moliere and it is surprising to see him tell the story of a statuette, which
he has found in the market, where a man was asking for $ 20 –was it? - and it
took the billionaire one hour to take the price down to $ 10 for a work of art
that he estimates at over one million.
If this looks like an outrageous,
cheap game played by the richest man of the planet, it must also be said that a
classic of positive psychology, Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi, author of the
archetypal Flow, mentions the example of an Italian art dealer who would refuse
a client who does not negotiate, because he is “in the zone” when haggling,
without this negotiation there is no Flow.
Nevertheless, when pressed by the
demands of the kidnappers, Gail Harris decides to sell the valuable gift and
travels to the Sotheby’s auction house to try to obtain the million dollars or
more for the expensive possession, only to be told that the object is actually
worth only $ 15.
One lesson from this incident and
the whole story might be to think twice or more about rejecting a share of the
fortune, which is what Ms. Harris had done, when she divorced her husband, she
specified that she wants no part of the Getty wealth; she only wants custody of
her children.
When the criminals ask for seventeen
million dollars, the richest man’s response is that he will not pay, when
further asked, he insists he has no money to spare, it is a difficult time and
when Fletcher Chase mentions the oil crisis which brings Getty so much more,
the latter still refuses to do anything for his unfortunate relative.
Meanwhile, as the gangsters saw that
the mother has nothing and the wealthy old man does not play ball- he even
speaks to the press and refers to his many relatives claiming that there is no
way he would give in, because after that he would have to pay millions every
day- they mutilate the poor boy.
Cinquanta plays a double game,
calling the mother and warning her about the intentions of the other members of
the gang, but as part of this complicated position, he is the one who holds
young Paul down, when a doctor comes to cut one ear off, to be presented to the
family and convince them that other anatomical parts would follow if the
millions do not materialize.
A newspaper offers $ fifty thousand
for the right to print the gory images, insisting that they know that the
mother has no money and therefore this sum could help- Gail Harris rejects the
notion of trading with the suffering and trauma of her beloved son, but has a
brilliant idea, asking for one thousand copies of the newspaper in return for
the copyright.
She sends the big packages to the
residence- palace actually- of the wealthiest but also poorest man on earth-
destitute not financially, but emotionally- and this appears to work as the
heinous Getty pays more attention to the issue and finds that there is a way to
deduct some tax from this kidnapping.
Loathsome as he is, he wants to
offer a loan to his son, for tax purposes, since there is not legal benefit
from paying ransom, and he wants in exchange that his daughter in law would
give away the custody of the children.
Most critics have been happy with
this motion picture, but you may find it less rewarding that expected, unless
you consider Hamlet:
“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so”
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu