Dinner for Schmucks, by David Guion
Steve
Carell, Paul Rudd, Zach Galifianakis, David Walliams and other members of the
cast of Dinner for Schmucks are phenomenal actors, comedians most of them,
artists that have done brilliant work, for instance:
David Walliams
in Little Britain, a hilarious comedy series, created by the star together with
the other protagonist, Matt Lucas
Alas, all
these dazzling, effervescent, enchanting performers do not manage to combine
their efforts and deliver a satisfying feature for the audiences- 87,120
viewers have given only a rating of 5,9 on IMDB.
The Metascore
is a lamentable 56 out of 100.
The very
idea of the motion picture would seem preposterous, perhaps even offending in
an age of political correctness, although the original on which this is based,
Le Diner de Cons, might have worked better.
Tim aka
Paul Rudd, is a young executive that wants to rise in the hierarchy, enjoys his
Porsche, lavish apartment and fancy life style and has a chance to climb even
faster when he finds Mueller, portrayed by David Walliams.
Mueller is worth
many hundreds of millions – perhaps billions- and the company where Tim works
would like to help him invest his fortune, making a big profit in the process,
and the creative Tim has an unusual, interesting approach…
Lamps, interesting
design , art are among the interests of the rich man and the message sent by
the ambitious Tim gets the attention of his target and the knowledge that he
had gained proves crucial in getting better acquainted, speculating on the
latest acquisition, a Matisse which was bought at auction.
Nevertheless,
in his private life, the hero is not so successful, in fact, his girlfriend is mad
when she hears what her lover has in mind, to attend the Dinner for Schmucks,
organized by the leaders of his company, where they invite idiots so that they
can make fun at them.
Indeed, it is
a very cruel proposition and it must be emphasized that the motion picture does
not propose that we all take a wild ride and laugh till we drop on account of
challenged people…
This is not
exactly the open message!
However,
there are scenes when viewers might find the shenanigans of Steve Carell as
Barry humorous, ,even if this an awkward character, obsessed with mice to the
extent where he jumps in front of the car driven by Tim to save a …dead one.
Following the
accident, the exchange is so absurd and preposterous as to cause some mirth,
even if not uproarious laughter, when the evidently rich driver talks about the
damages and the silly Barry talks about figures in terms of…$ 5, then he moves
on to ten thousand dollars…
Only he is not
asking for the money to forget about lawyers, trial…he thinks that is what he
would have to pay the owner of the Porsche, until the driver tells him to
forget about the whole thing and they start talking about…mice.
The victim
of the accident, now that he is standing up again, collects his things and
shows his new friend a version of…The Last Supper, where all the protagonist
are stuffed mice with beards.
As a symbol
of their new born friendship, Barry gives his comrade the star of the Last
supper, the little Jesus and he is invited to Dinner with friends, the day
after tomorrow, only he shows a day earlier, as a shmuck would do, only to
create so much trouble in the life of the rather obnoxious Tim.
His girlfriend
is so mad at the project of the Shmucks gathering that they have a confrontation
and she gets out, just as Barry comes in, a day early, pushes his friend to the
floor, then calls a stalker and gives her the address and mistakes Tim’s
partner for the intruding woman and makes her even angrier.
De gustibus non est disputandum
However, it
seems this project is not worthwhile, even if one uses a large dose of
tolerance and thinks of the supposed effort of educating mean individuals- men
most likely- on the subject the cruelty of taking advantage of challenged
humans who do not have the capacity to process so well.
Besides, one
of the good points of the film might be that the offenders, the pretentious,
presumed intelligent, high-ranking, successful executives are in fact the ones
who demonstrate a multitude of flaws of character.
Their Emotional
Intelligence- which new studies propose as more important than IQ- is at very
low points, sometimes approaching zero and their effectiveness in society might
be much lower than the people they want to ridicule and take advantage of, with
all their misguided obsession with stuffed mice and replicas of the Last
supper.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu