marți, 11 iunie 2019

Pygmalion, written by George Bernard Shaw, based on his play, inspired by the ancient Greek myth - 9.4 out of 10


Pygmalion, written by George Bernard Shaw, based on his play, inspired by the ancient Greek myth
9.4 out of 10


Pygmalion is based on the ancient Greek myth, about the sculptor named Pygmalion who creates a statue that is so beautiful that he falls in love with it and then asks the gods to give it life and they do, therefore Galatea becomes a human being.

In psychology, The Pygmalion Effect has been studied in schools, where it was discovered that teachers who believed in the capacities, skills, potential of their students had better results, in that those pupils who benefited from this trust went on to obtain excellent results.
It works in other areas too, when students believe in their professors, these became better, and this can be applied by management, for when business leaders have confidence in those who are under their command, the benefits are visible and quantifiable, as well as the reverse.

The opening scenes take place when rain is forcing people to take refuge, an occasion for the flower girl Eliza Doolittle aka the Oscar nominated Wendy Hiller to try to sell some to the upper class people that are waiting for a taxi, which Freddy Eynsford Hill had gone to fetch, while his mother and sister are waiting.
Professor Henry Higgins, portrayed by Academy Award Nominee Leslie Howard – known for his role in Gone with the Wind - http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/05/gone-with-wind-based-on-pulitzer-prize.html - is a phonetics expert who is trying to listen to conversations and find interesting accents and speech patterns.

He is able to place anyone he listens to within a very short distance in the country and in London, that precision is increased to an astonishing level, for he seems to be the ultimate, quintessential authority on speech, interested to look for and find Colonel George Pickering, another specialist, who happens to be in the same spot.
The colonel has travelled all the way from India to meet the professor, who in turn had been planning to sail to India to find the colonel and now they are about to embark on an interesting ‘experiment’, with the colonel showing a humane, kind, sensitive, polite, decent personality, while Higgins is so abject at times that he would be rejected at the present, a film like this would not be made.
While Colonel Pickering is staying with the professor, invited to avoid the hotel and be his guest, a visitor arrives and it turns out to be Eliza Doolittle, who is interested to get some lessons, for she had heard the other night that this is a language expert and she thinks that she would be able to get a flower shop if she furthers her education and she is willing to pay.

The money she has working on the street are a pittance for the much better off phonetics expert, but he is wise to calculate what the offer means, related to her standard of living and this is a fortune she offers, as an important amount of her total, rather small income, which she is ready to offer to get further and have a career, although she would soon be made to suffer, forced to take her clothes (in the privacy of the bathroom, not in public) off and have the bath which she resents most in the world…or so it looks like.
What is annoying and unacceptable for the modern viewer – who has nevertheless to look at things in perspective, considering the ancient myth and the époque when George Bernard Shaw has written the script for the film – is the sexist, misogynistic, abusive attitude of the professor, who keeps insulting the poor girl, insisting that he ‘treats a duchess as a poor woman and vice versa’.

The colonel and the professor make a bet, with the latter claiming that he would be able to pass the uneducated flower girl, with her awful accent, abominable grammar and lack of any knowledge of etiquette, rules of engagement, manners in society for a duchess, once he is finished with phonetics, posture, correct English, which should take him a few months and then they would attend an important gathering and see the extraordinary results.
First of all, this is a comedy and the confrontation between Pygmalion and Galatea is supposed to be – and it often is – amusing, although in this modern age it could well be embarrassing and deemed unacceptable, and we need to highlight the fact that Eliza could be seen as the Ultimate Winner, not just in terms of education gained, knowledge of proper English and good behavior, but she may be the one who teaches a more important lesson.

Notwithstanding his expertise on language, Professor Higgins is worse than ignorant in what love means, and ultimately, life itself, for he limits himself to super pronunciation and locating cockney accents, but he treats women – granted other humans too – with contempt, he suggests after they win their competition that Eliza marries the colonel, or somebody else and he is rather despicable, especially for one who is supposed to be the Hero.
Finally, the undersigned must say that George Bernard Shaw was such a peculiar man that the perception of his works is affected by his politics – supportive of the communists and the Soviets, which is anathema for someone who has had to live in a regime installed by these vicious people – and his rather outré persona, often amusing, but rather arrogant and pretentious – even when the Oscar was awarded for the script of this film, the writer said something to the effect that this like giving a prize to George for being the King of Britain.

Pygmalion has been included on The New York Times’ Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made list, available here:


Niciun comentariu:

Trimiteți un comentariu