Phil Spector, written
and directed by David Mamet
Phil Spector is written and directed by David
Mamet and stars Al Pacino
However, this is no Glengarry Glen Ross
Glengarry is an Absolute Masterpiece
Phil Spector only the other hand, in spite of
its nominations and wins is a much lesser achievement.
From this viewer’s perspective at least.
Al Pacino is a super star now, but his acting
has suffered a lot over the past decades and gone are the days of
The Godfather I and II
One can read about those glory days in the
entertaining and insightful book on Hollywood called:
The Kid Stays in the
Picture
The author, Robert Evans, has been an actor,
producer and head of the Paramount Studio, the ultimate insider.
When he initiated the project of The Godfather,
it looked like another failed picture on the Italian mafia.
Important people have objected to most aspects
concerning this film that is probably the best ever made.
One serious objection regarded the unknown Al
Pacino.
Indeed, he was such an unfamiliar entity that,
when Robert Evans talked to another executive, that one did not know the name
and told Evans to spell it…Al who?
When the agent called another studio to release
him from the project he was working on, the same thing happened again…
Who? Al…spell it for
me, will you…
In another phenomenal book on the film
industry, we learn about Al Pacino as an established artist.
Adventures in the
Screen Trade by the
winner of two Academy Awards, William Goldman reveals a darker side.
When filming in very cold temperatures, Pacino
made the members of the large crew suffer just because he was a star now.
That is the feeling one may get from the
reading of the passage dedicated to that incident, which is not an isolated
one.
Other stars are misbehaving on a regular basis:
Dustin Hoffman on the set of Marathon Man is another example.
Phil Spector is evidently the hero of the film
called by his name.
In addition, he is a rather obnoxious, arrogant,
self-indulgent, unlikeable character.
This is probably the main reason why this
viewer did not engage with this motion picture that has a repellent “hero”.
On the other hand, though, Phil Spector may be
a victim of this annoying personality and innocent of the murder he is charged
with.
This is a reason for audiences to follow the
thread of the narrative and eventually empathize with the accused.
In spite or because of his flamboyance, his
many wigs- are they wigs or is it “natural” hair, as in the case of another
infamous, loathsome Donald?
Spector has some outbursts that offend, one of
them targeting the acclaimed Sydney Poitier, whom the antihero calls a “white
guy who is scared by the color of his skin”…words to that effect, not a quote
though.
A woman dies in the house of this Wig Man and
all the circumstantial evidence points towards him.
His explanation though may carry some weight-
he says she took the gun into her mouth, he shouted at her to stop and as she
moved it, accidentally shot herself.
Is this the truth?
Maybe
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu