22 July,
written and directed by Paul Greengrass, based on the book One of Us by Asne
Seierstad
Eight out
of 10
22 July is the
date when, in 2011, an extremist called Anders Behring Breivik has killed seventy-seven
people in the most unlikely country of all – Norway.
Paul Greengrass
has already proved the genius with which he can present the details, panoramic
view, extreme human tension, and excruciating drama when he has handled with
brilliance the story of United 93.
The handling
of this other calamity is no less astute, although it is sometimes, perhaps
most of the time, difficult to establish if using the Norwegian cast has made
this ever more compelling or it is less dramatic in this way.
There is certain
coldness, or the appearance of a detachment, which could certainly be the
Nordic way of interiorizing, hiding instead of expressing emotions in the way
people from the south, Mediterraneans would do it.
Breivik is the
terrorist who took single handedly the task of killing as many as possible, in
order to promote his extreme right views that Europe should halt the arrival of
refugees from Muslim – and presumably other communities and religions –
countries.
In order to
“advertise” his views he buys fertilizer and the other ingredients needed for a
bomb that, once made, he places near the offices of the Norwegian Prime
minister, Jens Stoltenberg.
The guards
watching the security cameras see the van that is parked outside and they send
a man to verify it, but by the time the unknown vehicle is approached, the
device is set off and people are killed and injured, the square is sent into
mayhem.
Meanwhile,
the murderer is driving a car towards the island of Utoya, dressed in the uniform
of the police and carrying suitcases with guns and ammunition to the place
where a major conference is held at the Labor Party Youth Camp.
Breivik would
be given the chance to explain himself and he would say that he wanted to
target the party he hates most, the one most friendly towards immigrants where
it hurts most, killing the children of the leaders, those who would have become
leaders themselves.
When the
terrorist arrives at the shore opposite the island, he calls for the ferry to
cross and he states that he is sent by the Oslo police department to secure the
area and he talks to two of the organizers about the fact that all personnel is
summoned to the bombing that just took place.
This is the
reason he gives for being sent alone, which might have triggered one alarm
bell, but when one of the supervisors talks about someone he knows at the
police headquarters and the villain has little to say on the subject, this might
have been reason to become suspicious.
When the
man asking about his friend with the Oslo police asks for an ID, the killer
takes out one of his guns and then shoots the people near him from close
distance, moving on to systematically murder young men and women all around the
island.
He walks
into the meeting rooms, shouting and announcing all those present that they are
about to die, then moves among the trees, takes a rifle that has a scope and
then kills more of those who try to run and hide wherever they can.
Viljar Hanssen
becomes one of the main characters of this drama, and his group tries to hide
near the water, by staying suspended near something like a cliff, where the
terrorist eventually arrives and shoots more of those who run for their lives,
hitting the young man five times.
Viljar Hanssen
is hit in his shoulder, head and legs, he would have to be operated, the
surgeon would try to take the bullet out of his head and the others in the rest
of the body, but fragments would remain and he would face the danger that any
time, one of those remaining pieces in the head would kill him…at any moment.
The Special
Forces eventually arrive and arrest the monster who would not show any remorse,
on the contrary, he would insist that he needs to talk at the trial, where he
states that he has committed a “political act”.
In the
first stages of the investigation, the law enforcement agencies are concerned
by the repeated claims made by the assassin that there are others and they are
about to launch other attacks.
The arrogance,
brazenness, incredible calm, vicious indifference to what is being said during
the interviews and then at the trial are incredible, although this is probably
a classic case of the ultimate psychopath.
A psychopath
is one who experiences no emotions or feelings, but is able to exploit the
sentiments of others to extraordinary effect, just like the loathsome, gruesome
Breivik, who felt nothing, but was obsessed with his ego and the calamitous goals
he pursued to the end.
A defense
lawyer is available for him – who would be threaten by those who feel he is defending
a monster, just like in Bridge of Spies – and professionals are sent to assess
his mental health – they arrive initially at the conclusion that he is paranoid,
but he wants to be on trial as a sane individual.
Finally, it
is hard to conclude if this is a landmark, even if it is definitely memorable,
but it is difficult to estimate how much of the overwhelming effect is due to
the real story and how much to the rather rigid Norwegian cast’s retelling of
it.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu